From: Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
markzhang@nvidia.com, leonro@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v2 1/2] lib/fs: fix memory leak in get_task_name()
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2022 19:21:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YiZNNQB727Il+EVN@tc2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527dab8b-6eba-da17-8cef-2614042c9688@kernel.org>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:58:37AM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/2/22 5:28 AM, Andrea Claudi wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/utils.h b/include/utils.h
> > index b6c468e9..81294488 100644
> > --- a/include/utils.h
> > +++ b/include/utils.h
> > @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ char *find_cgroup2_mount(bool do_mount);
> > __u64 get_cgroup2_id(const char *path);
> > char *get_cgroup2_path(__u64 id, bool full);
> > int get_command_name(const char *pid, char *comm, size_t len);
> > -char *get_task_name(pid_t pid);
> > +int get_task_name(pid_t pid, char *name);
> >
>
> changing to an API with an assumed length is not better than the current
> situation. Why not just fixup the callers as needed to free the allocation?
>
I actually did that on v1. After Stephen's comment about asprintf(), I
got the idea to make get_task_name() similar to get_command_name() and
a bit more "user-friendly", so that callers do not need a free().
If you think this is not ideal, I can post a v3 with the necessary fixes
to the callers.
Thanks,
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-07 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-02 12:28 [PATCH iproute2 v2 0/2] fix memory leak in get_task_name() Andrea Claudi
2022-03-02 12:28 ` [PATCH iproute2 v2 1/2] lib/fs: " Andrea Claudi
2022-03-03 18:56 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-07 18:07 ` Andrea Claudi
2022-03-07 18:12 ` David Ahern
2022-03-09 13:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-07 17:58 ` David Ahern
2022-03-07 18:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-07 18:21 ` Andrea Claudi [this message]
2022-03-07 19:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-03-07 22:38 ` David Ahern
2022-03-02 12:28 ` [PATCH iproute2 v2 2/2] rdma: make RES_PID and RES_KERN_NAME alternative to each other Andrea Claudi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YiZNNQB727Il+EVN@tc2 \
--to=aclaudi@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=markzhang@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox