From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: <idosch@nvidia.com>, <petrm@nvidia.com>,
<simon.horman@corigine.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 11:07:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yim/wpHAN/d0S9MC@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310001632.470337-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 04:16:26PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This series puts the devlink ports fully under the devlink instance
> lock's protection. As discussed in the past it implements my preferred
> solution of exposing the instance lock to the drivers. This way drivers
> which want to support port splitting can lock the devlink instance
> themselves on the probe path, and we can take that lock in the core
> on the split/unsplit paths.
>
> nfp and mlxsw are converted, with slightly deeper changes done in
> nfp since I'm more familiar with that driver.
>
> Now that the devlink port is protected we can pass a pointer to
> the drivers, instead of passing a port index and forcing the drivers
> to do their own lookups. Both nfp and mlxsw can container_of() to
> their own structures.
>
> I'd appreciate some testing, I don't have access to this HW.
>
> Jakub Kicinski (6):
> devlink: expose instance locking and add locked port registering
> eth: nfp: wrap locking assertions in helpers
> eth: nfp: replace driver's "pf" lock with devlink instance lock
> eth: mlxsw: switch to explicit locking for port registration
> devlink: hold the instance lock in port_split / port_unsplit callbacks
> devlink: pass devlink_port to port_split / port_unsplit callbacks
Jakub,
Thanks for pursuing in cleanup this devlink mess.
Do you plan to send a series that removes devlink_mutex?
Thanks
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core.c | 36 ++---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/minimal.c | 6 +
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 7 +
> .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/flower/main.c | 4 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_app.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_app.h | 12 +-
> .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 55 +++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main.c | 19 +--
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_main.h | 6 +-
> .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c | 34 ++--
> .../net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 4 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_port.c | 17 --
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_port.h | 2 -
> include/net/devlink.h | 15 +-
> net/core/devlink.c | 148 ++++++++++--------
> 15 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 171 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 9:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 0:16 [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 1/6] devlink: expose instance locking and add locked port registering Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 9:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10 20:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 9:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-11 16:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 12:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-11 16:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 16:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 16:57 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 17:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 17:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 17:49 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 18:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 18:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 2/6] eth: nfp: wrap locking assertions in helpers Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 3/6] eth: nfp: replace driver's "pf" lock with devlink instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 4/6] eth: mlxsw: switch to explicit locking for port registration Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 9:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10 20:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 5/6] devlink: hold the instance lock in port_split / port_unsplit callbacks Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 0:16 ` [RFT net-next 6/6] devlink: pass devlink_port to " Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-10 8:57 ` [RFT net-next 0/6] devlink: expose instance locking and simplify port splitting Ido Schimmel
2022-03-10 21:13 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-10 21:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 18:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-14 19:10 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-03-14 20:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-15 7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-15 15:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-15 17:54 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-10 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-03-10 9:07 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-03-10 20:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-03-11 6:30 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-03-11 10:48 ` Simon Horman
2022-03-11 16:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yim/wpHAN/d0S9MC@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).