From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C59BC433EF for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346132AbiCUJ6I (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:58:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39958 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1346059AbiCUJ5o (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 05:57:44 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x631.google.com (mail-ej1-x631.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::631]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F6D13700E for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x631.google.com with SMTP id yy13so28719147ejb.2 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:56:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eI81Cj2MzQaMOBuzQ4GEFQs/9QyzMW3B2HHtrtblKg8=; b=YJPfZoOkdyk0Tw+7qRPh58EnUzvFx/fTdWHKqFyZmi3tjW/JAmH3VGGB6hObEkNF0f X0RBZ4rFRZjCkceuK4AvtYTZ0Uf/x6DyBNOVb41hXmyMNV+utHkwvIHDTIgqgqbftgdd 5tfiuGzD/H+vzXqPKSHeWCUgJyX0iF+wfruDFv3yDaTNPficgmjOQwYiJ2mzRqvMBanK Sc12hG92iiqKORIdhiqE/vH6cKhFY81FHUJGNeEmPi/hKJjFCZRsmi1FmX8Awapf2jl+ A/8jlPesJR25JMWH2giDPCUb73DyLoEa2UqWyTzzRdAhzUQQyQDJmJg62cUHcy5Zfw4T HndA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=eI81Cj2MzQaMOBuzQ4GEFQs/9QyzMW3B2HHtrtblKg8=; b=xP2GjgnMxQeI5y6FXTetV5S4i1oGyv2CCT/m+qdxcjI89P519fIU61qs8IkBJmUfzE DShsuIYGEaq/FJw3P2xUdYbo5jxiQOjduz8zBFtmNOXVSRDb0obwpGUwrwk5BbavJKk+ 6BpDEJ49Q0V8nhWxx9oR91zQR0Rf9yoP9dOHtxisaeExDQQp3LwAKpnnOVjtwztVetMJ VAcrwmlwLEYhggfHQU2XJWCWdNv7p27hzFxYiI5UE24IJ0El8S8kHRO26bcp2ZijdU2m 1O19JmgSuSPGzh4qb1SJo6GDtzCZrVuVWpPV/I6q42ulJYeupHKMK+QRlfCLf5AFXOtk GIvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531x1JOclffgCHiC4UIJz1ptb98o5BNHz5EeoeYSX5VIRF1gK6lO 1R4BLOxws+VAiGsdJBBGehXr4A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0UT1aElj4+q/uZ+QoYpSKFRtuFmYPQhlHb8WqNQdNafN1f0TRcyUfBcsRmw4yj14/DLBiFw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:971f:b0:6df:a42d:7b00 with SMTP id jg31-20020a170907971f00b006dfa42d7b00mr17609349ejc.159.1647856577608; Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z13-20020a17090674cd00b006df78d85eabsm1898054ejl.111.2022.03.21.02.56.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Mar 2022 02:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 10:56:16 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Sun Shouxin Cc: j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huyd12@chinatelecom.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] net:bonding:Add support for IPV6 RLB to balance-alb mode Message-ID: References: <20220321084704.36370-1-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> <20220321084704.36370-5-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220321084704.36370-5-sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 09:47:04AM CET, sunshouxin@chinatelecom.cn wrote: >This patch is implementing IPV6 RLB for balance-alb mode. As I stated in the other thread, I strongly believe it is bad idea to add this code. It is not needed. User should use LACP and not obscure ALB/RLB mode. It should not be extented. On contrary, I would like to see this going opposite direction and eventually remove ALB/RLB mode from bonding.