Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 1/4] drivers: net: dsa: qca8k: drop MTU tracking from qca8k_priv
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 15:03:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YjnXOF2TZ7o8Zy2P@Ansuel-xps.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220322135535.au5d2n7hcu4mfdxr@skbuf>

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 03:55:35PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:38:08PM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 01:58:12PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 02:45:03AM +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> > > > Drop the MTU array from qca8k_priv and use slave net dev to get the max
> > > > MTU across all user port. CPU port can be skipped as DSA already make
> > > > sure CPU port are set to the max MTU across all ports.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > I hardly find this to be an improvement and I would rather not see such
> > > unjustified complexity in a device driver. What are the concrete
> > > benefits, size wise?
> > >
> > 
> > The main idea here is, if the value is already present and accessible,
> > why should we duplicate it? Tracking the MTU in this custom way already
> > caused some bugs (check the comment i'm removing). We both use standard
> > way to track ports MTU and we save some additional space. At the cost of
> > 2 additional checks are are not that much of a problem.
> 
> Where is the bug?
>

There was a bug where we tracked the MTU with the FCS and L2 added and
then in the change_mtu code we added another time the FCS and L2 header
just because we used this custom way and nobody notice that we were adding
2 times the same headers. (it's now fixed but still it's a reason why
using standard way to track MTU would have prevented that)

> > Also from this I discovered that (at least on ipq806x that use stmmac)
> > when master needs to change MTU, stmmac complains that the interface is
> > up and it must be put down. Wonder if that's common across other drivers
> > or it's only specific to stmmac.
> 
> I never had the pleasure of dealing with such DSA masters. I wonder why
> can't stmmac_change_mtu() check if netif_running(), call dev_close and
> set a bool, and at the end, if the bool was set, call dev_open back?

Oh ok so it's not standard that stmmac_change_mtu() just refuse to
change the MTU instead of put the interface down, change MTU and reopen
it... Fun stuff...

From system side to change MTU to a new value (so lower MTU on any port
or set MTU to a higher value for one pot) I have to:
1. ifconfig eth0 down
2. ifconfig lan1 mtu 1600 up
3. ifconfig eth up

If I just ifconfig lan1 mtu 1600 up it's just rejected with stmmac
complaining.

-- 
	Ansuel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-22 14:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-22  1:45 [net-next PATCH 0/4] Reduce qca8k_priv space usage Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22  1:45 ` [net-next PATCH 1/4] drivers: net: dsa: qca8k: drop MTU tracking from qca8k_priv Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22 11:58   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-22 13:38     ` Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22 13:55       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-22 14:03         ` Ansuel Smith [this message]
2022-03-24 10:45           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-24 20:44             ` Ansuel Smith
2022-03-24 21:05               ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-24 23:10                 ` Ansuel Smith
2022-03-24 23:14                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-03-24 23:24                     ` Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22  1:45 ` [net-next PATCH 2/4] drivers: net: dsa: qca8k: drop port_sts " Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22  1:45 ` [net-next PATCH 3/4] drivers: net: dsa: qca8k: rework and simplify mdiobus logic Ansuel Smith
2022-03-22  1:45 ` [net-next PATCH 4/4] drivers: net: dsa: qca8k: drop dsa_switch_ops from qca8k_priv Ansuel Smith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YjnXOF2TZ7o8Zy2P@Ansuel-xps.localdomain \
    --to=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox