From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 4/5] net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 21:32:39 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkyLR+VBb81npXnC@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220405172049.slomqla4pmnyczbj@sx1>
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 10:20:49AM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 05 Apr 08:43, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 05:33:22PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > > On 04 Apr 15:08, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > > >
> > > > After removal FPGA TLS, we can remove tls->ktls indirection too,
> > > > as it is the same thing.
>
> [...]
>
> > > rename drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/{tls_stats.c => ktls_stats.c} (76%)
> > >
> > > Why not ktls_*.c => tls_*.c ?
> >
> > Mostly because other drivers use _ktls_ name for this type of functionality.
> > Plus internally, Tariq suggested to squash everything into ktls.
> >
> > >
> > > Since we now have one TLS implementation, it would've been easier to maybe
> > > repurpose TLS to be KTLS only and avoid renaming every TLS to KTLS in all
> > > functions and files.
> > >
> > > So just keep tls.c and all mlx5_tls_xyz functions and implement ktls
> > > directly in them, the renaming will be done only on the ktls implementation
> > > part of the code rather than in every caller.
> >
> > Should I do it or keep this patch as is?
> >
>
> Keep it, i don't have any strong feeling about this,
> I just wanted to reduce the patch size.
Thanks for the review.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-05 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-04 12:08 [PATCH mlx5-next 0/5] Drop Mellanox FPGA TLS support from the kernel Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 1/5] net/mlx5_fpga: Drop INNOVA TLS support Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 2/5] net/mlx5: Reliably return TLS device capabilities Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 3/5] net/mlx5: Remove indirection in TLS build Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 4/5] net/mlx5: Remove tls vs. ktls separation as it is the same Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 0:33 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-05 5:43 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 17:20 ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-05 18:32 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-04-04 12:08 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/5] net/mlx5: Cleanup kTLS function names and their exposure Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-05 0:35 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 0/5] Drop Mellanox FPGA TLS support from the kernel Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-06 7:04 ` Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkyLR+VBb81npXnC@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).