From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, roopa@nvidia.com,
kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 07/12] net: rtnetlink: add NLM_F_BULK support to rtnl_fdb_del
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:35:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlbDeNh7D+BHRscg@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e22bd42c-f257-82d6-f550-6e174c74b500@blackwall.org>
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 03:21:54PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 13/04/2022 15:20, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 01:51:57PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >> When NLM_F_BULK is specified in a fdb del message we need to handle it
> >> differently. First since this is a new call we can strictly validate the
> >> passed attributes, at first only ifindex and vlan are allowed as these
> >> will be the initially supported filter attributes, any other attribute
> >> is rejected. The mac address is no longer mandatory, but we use it
> >> to error out in older kernels because it cannot be specified with bulk
> >> request (the attribute is not allowed) and then we have to dispatch
> >> the call to ndo_fdb_del_bulk if the device supports it. The del bulk
> >> callback can do further validation of the attributes if necessary.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
> >> ---
> >> v4: mark PF_BRIDGE/RTM_DELNEIGH with RTNL_FLAG_BULK_DEL_SUPPORTED
> >>
> >> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >> index 63c7df52a667..520d50fcaaea 100644
> >> --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >> +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> >> @@ -4169,22 +4169,34 @@ int ndo_dflt_fdb_del(struct ndmsg *ndm,
> >> }
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ndo_dflt_fdb_del);
> >>
> >> +static const struct nla_policy fdb_del_bulk_policy[NDA_MAX + 1] = {
> >> + [NDA_VLAN] = { .type = NLA_U16 },
> >
> > In earlier versions br_vlan_valid_id() was used to validate the VLAN,
> > but I don't see it anymore. Maybe use
> >
> > NLA_POLICY_RANGE(1, VLAN_N_VID - 2)
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I realize that invalid values won't do anything, but I think it's better
> > to only allow valid ranges.
> >
>
> It's already validated below, see fdb_vid_parse().
Sorry, missed it :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-13 10:51 [PATCH net-next v4 00/12] net: bridge: add flush filtering support Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/12] net: rtnetlink: add msg kind names Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/12] net: rtnetlink: add helper to extract msg type's kind Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/12] net: rtnetlink: use BIT for flag values Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/12] net: netlink: add NLM_F_BULK delete request modifier Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-09-20 7:49 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-09-20 9:05 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-09-21 6:43 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/12] net: rtnetlink: add bulk delete support flag Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 12:06 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-04-13 12:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-14 0:42 ` David Ahern
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/12] net: add ndo_fdb_del_bulk Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/12] net: rtnetlink: add NLM_F_BULK support to rtnl_fdb_del Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 12:20 ` Ido Schimmel
2022-04-13 12:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 12:35 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/12] net: bridge: fdb: add ndo_fdb_del_bulk Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:51 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/12] net: bridge: fdb: add support for fine-grained flushing Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/12] net: rtnetlink: add ndm flags and state mask attributes Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/12] net: bridge: fdb: add support for flush filtering based on ndm flags and state Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 10:52 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/12] net: bridge: fdb: add support for flush filtering based on ifindex and vlan Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-04-13 11:50 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/12] net: bridge: add flush filtering support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YlbDeNh7D+BHRscg@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox