netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 10/17] net/mlx5: Clean IPsec FS add/delete rules
Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 11:52:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ym5KTD6cHatGlVCm@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220422222536.uxyyveytmmkwvwjv@sx1>

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 03:25:36PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 19 Apr 13:13, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > 
> > Reuse existing struct to pass parameters instead of open code them.
> > 
> 
> Why? what do you mean "open code them" ? they are not open coded, they are
> primitive for a reason ! If we go with this reasoning, then let's pass
> mlx5e_priv to all functions and just forget about modularity.

There is not much value in having modularity between files/layers in
same block. These layers are not usable outside of that block (IPsec)
and ipsec.c is tightly coupled with ipsec_fs.c anyway by ensuring that
unsupported options are handled as early as possible.

The remove of existing artificial layering allows me to see useless
fields (see patch #17) and remove code that can't be executed anyway.

Separation between blocks (mlx5e_priv) is good and right thing,
separation inside blocks is not.

Thanks

> 
> > Reviewed-by: Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c       | 10 +---
> > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h       |  7 +--
> > .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c    | 55 ++++++++++---------
> > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> > index 537311a74bfb..81c9831ad286 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> > @@ -313,9 +313,7 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> > 	if (err)
> > 		goto err_xfrm;
> > 
> > -	err = mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_add_rule(priv, &sa_entry->attrs,
> > -					    sa_entry->ipsec_obj_id,
> > -					    &sa_entry->ipsec_rule);
> > +	err = mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_add_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> 
> To add to my comment on the previous patch, in here the issue is more
> severe as previously ipsec_fs.c was unaware of sa_entry object and used to
> deal with pure fs related objects, you are peppering the code with sa_entry for
> no reason, other than reducing function parameters from 4 to 2.
> > 	if (err)
> > 		goto err_hw_ctx;
> > 
> > @@ -333,8 +331,7 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> > 	goto out;
> > 
> > err_add_rule:
> > -	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(priv, &sa_entry->attrs,
> > -				      &sa_entry->ipsec_rule);
> > +	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > err_hw_ctx:
> > 	mlx5_ipsec_free_sa_ctx(sa_entry);
> > err_xfrm:
> > @@ -357,8 +354,7 @@ static void mlx5e_xfrm_free_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
> > 	struct mlx5e_priv *priv = netdev_priv(x->xso.dev);
> > 
> > 	cancel_work_sync(&sa_entry->modify_work.work);
> > -	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(priv, &sa_entry->attrs,
> > -				      &sa_entry->ipsec_rule);
> > +	mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > 	mlx5_ipsec_free_sa_ctx(sa_entry);
> > 	kfree(sa_entry);
> > }
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > index cdcb95f90623..af1467cbb7c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.h
> > @@ -176,12 +176,9 @@ struct xfrm_state *mlx5e_ipsec_sadb_rx_lookup(struct mlx5e_ipsec *dev,
> > void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec);
> > int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_init(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec);
> > int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -				  struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -				  u32 ipsec_obj_id,
> > -				  struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule);
> > +				  struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry);
> > void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -				   struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -				   struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule);
> > +				   struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry);
> > 
> > int mlx5_ipsec_create_sa_ctx(struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry);
> > void mlx5_ipsec_free_sa_ctx(struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
> > index 96ab2e9d6f9a..342828351254 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec_fs.c
> > @@ -454,11 +454,12 @@ static void setup_fte_common(struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > }
> > 
> > static int rx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -		       struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -		       u32 ipsec_obj_id,
> > -		       struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +		       struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > 	u8 action[MLX5_UN_SZ_BYTES(set_add_copy_action_in_auto)] = {};
> > +	struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule = &sa_entry->ipsec_rule;
> > +	struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs = &sa_entry->attrs;
> > +	u32 ipsec_obj_id = sa_entry->ipsec_obj_id;
> > 	struct mlx5_modify_hdr *modify_hdr = NULL;
> > 	struct mlx5e_accel_fs_esp_prot *fs_prot;
> > 	struct mlx5_flow_destination dest = {};
> > @@ -532,9 +533,7 @@ static int rx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > }
> > 
> > static int tx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -		       struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -		       u32 ipsec_obj_id,
> > -		       struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +		       struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > 	struct mlx5_flow_act flow_act = {};
> > 	struct mlx5_flow_handle *rule;
> > @@ -551,7 +550,8 @@ static int tx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > 		goto out;
> > 	}
> > 
> > -	setup_fte_common(attrs, ipsec_obj_id, spec, &flow_act);
> > +	setup_fte_common(&sa_entry->attrs, sa_entry->ipsec_obj_id, spec,
> > +			 &flow_act);
> > 
> > 	/* Add IPsec indicator in metadata_reg_a */
> > 	spec->match_criteria_enable |= MLX5_MATCH_MISC_PARAMETERS_2;
> > @@ -566,11 +566,11 @@ static int tx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > 	if (IS_ERR(rule)) {
> > 		err = PTR_ERR(rule);
> > 		netdev_err(priv->netdev, "fail to add ipsec rule attrs->action=0x%x, err=%d\n",
> > -				attrs->action, err);
> > +				sa_entry->attrs.action, err);
> > 		goto out;
> > 	}
> > 
> > -	ipsec_rule->rule = rule;
> > +	sa_entry->ipsec_rule.rule = rule;
> > 
> > out:
> > 	kvfree(spec);
> > @@ -580,21 +580,25 @@ static int tx_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > }
> > 
> > static void rx_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -		struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -		struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +			struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > +	struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule = &sa_entry->ipsec_rule;
> > +
> > 	mlx5_del_flow_rules(ipsec_rule->rule);
> > 	ipsec_rule->rule = NULL;
> > 
> > 	mlx5_modify_header_dealloc(priv->mdev, ipsec_rule->set_modify_hdr);
> > 	ipsec_rule->set_modify_hdr = NULL;
> > 
> > -	rx_ft_put(priv, attrs->is_ipv6 ? ACCEL_FS_ESP6 : ACCEL_FS_ESP4);
> > +	rx_ft_put(priv,
> > +		  sa_entry->attrs.is_ipv6 ? ACCEL_FS_ESP6 : ACCEL_FS_ESP4);
> > }
> > 
> > static void tx_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -		struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +			struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > +	struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule = &sa_entry->ipsec_rule;
> > +
> > 	mlx5_del_flow_rules(ipsec_rule->rule);
> > 	ipsec_rule->rule = NULL;
> > 
> > @@ -602,24 +606,23 @@ static void tx_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > }
> > 
> > int mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_add_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -				  struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -				  u32 ipsec_obj_id,
> > -				  struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +				  struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > -	if (attrs->action == MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_DECRYPT)
> > -		return rx_add_rule(priv, attrs, ipsec_obj_id, ipsec_rule);
> > -	else
> > -		return tx_add_rule(priv, attrs, ipsec_obj_id, ipsec_rule);
> > +	if (sa_entry->attrs.action == MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_ENCRYPT)
> > +		return tx_add_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > +
> > +	return rx_add_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > }
> > 
> > void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_del_rule(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> > -		struct mlx5_accel_esp_xfrm_attrs *attrs,
> > -		struct mlx5e_ipsec_rule *ipsec_rule)
> > +				   struct mlx5e_ipsec_sa_entry *sa_entry)
> > {
> > -	if (attrs->action == MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_DECRYPT)
> > -		rx_del_rule(priv, attrs, ipsec_rule);
> > -	else
> > -		tx_del_rule(priv, ipsec_rule);
> > +	if (sa_entry->attrs.action == MLX5_ACCEL_ESP_ACTION_ENCRYPT) {
> > +		tx_del_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	rx_del_rule(priv, sa_entry);
> > }
> > 
> > void mlx5e_accel_ipsec_fs_cleanup(struct mlx5e_ipsec *ipsec)
> > -- 
> > 2.35.1
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-01  8:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-19 10:13 [PATCH net-next v1 00/17] Extra IPsec cleanup Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec flow steering init/cleanup functions Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/17] net/mlx5: Check IPsec TX flow steering namespace in advance Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/17] net/mlx5: Don't hide fallback to software IPsec in FS code Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/17] net/mlx5: Reduce useless indirection in IPsec FS add/delete flows Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/17] net/mlx5: Store IPsec ESN update work in XFRM state Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/17] net/mlx5: Remove useless validity check Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/17] net/mlx5: Merge various control path IPsec headers into one file Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/17] net/mlx5: Remove indirections from esp functions Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/17] net/mlx5: Simplify HW context interfaces by using SA entry Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 22:19   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-05-01  8:56     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/17] net/mlx5: Clean IPsec FS add/delete rules Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 22:25   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-05-01  8:52     ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 11/17] net/mlx5: Make sure that no dangling IPsec FS pointers exist Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 12/17] net/mlx5: Don't advertise IPsec netdev support for non-IPsec device Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 13/17] net/mlx5: Simplify IPsec capabilities logic Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 22:42   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-05-01  8:42     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 14/17] net/mlx5: Remove not-supported ICV length Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 15/17] net/mlx5: Cleanup XFRM attributes struct Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 22:45   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-05-01  8:05     ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 16/17] net/mlx5: Allow future addition of IPsec object modifiers Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 22:46   ` Saeed Mahameed
2022-04-19 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v1 17/17] net/mlx5: Don't perform lookup after already known sec_path Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v1 00/17] Extra IPsec cleanup Leon Romanovsky
2022-04-22 17:55   ` Saeed Mahameed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Ym5KTD6cHatGlVCm@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).