netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: b53: mark as non-legacy
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 08:39:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmJbzay/OiSAxYWF@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28bb4c50-c79e-8f09-2a00-ebbaa91ba1a6@gmail.com>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 03:31:26PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi Russell,
> 
> On 2/22/22 02:16, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > The B53 driver does not make use of the speed, duplex, pause or
> > advertisement in its phylink_mac_config() implementation, so it can be
> > marked as a non-legacy driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c | 6 ++++++
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> > index 50a372dc32ae..83bf30349c26 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/b53/b53_common.c
> > @@ -1346,6 +1346,12 @@ static void b53_phylink_get_caps(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> >   	/* Get the implementation specific capabilities */
> >   	if (dev->ops->phylink_get_caps)
> >   		dev->ops->phylink_get_caps(dev, port, config);
> > +
> > +	/* This driver does not make use of the speed, duplex, pause or the
> > +	 * advertisement in its mac_config, so it is safe to mark this driver
> > +	 * as non-legacy.
> > +	 */
> > +	config->legacy_pre_march2020 = false;
> 
> This patch appears to cause a regression for me, I am not sure why I did not
> notice it back when I tested it but I suspect it had to do with me testing
> only with a copper module and not with a fiber module.
> 
> Now that I tested it again, the SFP port (port 5 in my set-up) link up
> interrupt does not fire up when setting config->legacy_pre_march2020 to
> false.
> 
> Here is a working log with phylink debugging enabled:
> 
> # udhcpc -i sfp
> udhcpc: started, v1.35.0
> [   49.479637] bgmac-enet 18024000.ethernet eth2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full -
> flow control off
> [   49.488139] Generic PHY fixed-0:02: PHY state change UP -> RUNNING
> [   49.488256] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: configuring for
> inband/1000base-x link mode
> [   49.504062] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: major config
> 1000base-x
> [   49.511800] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp:
> phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/1000base-x/Unknown/Unknown
> adv=0000000,00000201
> [   49.527504] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link down
> [   49.535044] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:down:down event dev_up
> [   49.541006] sfp sfp: tx disable 1 -> 0
> [   49.544897] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:wait
> [   49.549509] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
> [   49.595185] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:up:wait event timeout
> [   49.601064] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:link_up
> [   52.388917] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link up
> [   52.396513] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: Link is Up -
> 1Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx
> [   52.406145] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): sfp: link becomes ready
> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
> udhcpc: broadcasting select for 192.168.3.156, server 192.168.3.1
> udhcpc: lease of 192.168.3.156 obtained from 192.168.3.1, lease time 600
> deleting routers
> adding dns 192.168.1.1
> 
> and one that is not working with phylink debugging enabled:
> 
> # udhcpc -i sfp
> udhcpc: started, v1.35.0
> [   27.863529] bgmac-enet 18024000.ethernet eth2: Link is Up - 1Gbps/Full -
> flow control off
> [   27.872021] Generic PHY fixed-0:02: PHY state change UP -> RUNNING
> [   27.872120] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: configuring for
> inband/1000base-x link mode
> [   27.887952] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: major config
> 1000base-x
> [   27.895689] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp:
> phylink_mac_config: mode=inband/1000base-x/Unknown/Unknown
> adv=0000000,00000201
> [   27.895802] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link down
> [   27.911945] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:down:down event dev_up
> [   27.923947] sfp sfp: tx disable 1 -> 0
> [   27.927835] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:wait
> [   27.932442] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth2: link becomes ready
> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
> [   27.978181] sfp sfp: SM: enter present:up:wait event timeout
> [   27.984056] sfp sfp: SM: exit present:up:link_up
> [   30.686440] b53-srab-switch 18036000.ethernet-switch sfp: mac link up
> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
> udhcpc: broadcasting discover
> 
> The mac side appears to be UP but not no carrier is set to the sfp network
> device. Do you have any idea why that would happen?

Oh, it's because setting that flag means we're wanting the PCS methods
rather than the legacy MAC methods for an_restart and getting the PCS
link state - so the patch in question was submitted too early (it
should have been _after_ the conversion to PCS.)

If we get the patch reverted in net-next, and then convert b53 to use
PCS support, we'll then be putting the patch back, so I wonder if it
would just make sense to apply the PCS conversion patch, possibly
adding a comment in the commit message pointing out that this fixes
the b53 legacy_pre_march2020 patch. Thoughts?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-22  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-22 10:14 [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: b53: convert to phylink_generic_validate() and mark as non-legacy Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] net: dsa: b53: clean up if() condition to be more readable Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: b53: populate supported_interfaces and mac_capabilities Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] net: dsa: b53: drop use of phylink_helper_basex_speed() Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] net: dsa: b53: switch to using phylink_generic_validate() Russell King (Oracle)
2022-02-22 10:16 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: dsa: b53: mark as non-legacy Russell King (Oracle)
2022-04-21 22:31   ` Florian Fainelli
2022-04-22  7:39     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2022-04-22 16:43       ` Florian Fainelli
2022-02-22 18:09 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] net: dsa: b53: convert to phylink_generic_validate() and " Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YmJbzay/OiSAxYWF@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).