From: Hangbin Liu <haliu@redhat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
toke@redhat.com, Paul Chaignon <paul@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 1/3] libbpf: Use bpf_object__load instead of bpf_object__load_xattr
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 10:29:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmdY9dLilPrHxz3Y@Laptop-X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cde7f66a-7a23-0d98-d5fe-04ecc8cd5f6b@kernel.org>
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 10:10:44AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 4/23/22 7:56 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > This patch revert c04e45d0 lib/bpf: fix verbose flag when using libbpf,
> > Should we set prog->log_level directly before it loaded, like
> > bpf_program__set_log_level() does?
> >
>
> that API is new - Dec 2021 so it will not be present across relevant
> libbpf versions. Detecting what exists in a libbpf version and adding
> compat wrappers needs to be added. That's an undertaking I do not have
> time for at the moment. If you or someone else does it would be appreciated.
>
Ah, yes, I forgot we can't set prog log_level directly. Looks we need to
add a new flag similar with HAVE_LIBBPF_SECTION_NAME... It's really a pain to
add more flags for libbfp...
Hi Paul, will you do that?
Thanks
Hangbin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-26 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-23 15:22 [PATCH iproute2-next 0/3] Address more libbpf deprecations David Ahern
2022-04-23 15:22 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 1/3] libbpf: Use bpf_object__load instead of bpf_object__load_xattr David Ahern
2022-04-24 1:56 ` Hangbin Liu
2022-04-24 16:10 ` David Ahern
2022-04-26 2:29 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2022-04-23 15:22 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 2/3] libbpf: Remove use of bpf_program__set_priv and bpf_program__priv David Ahern
2022-04-23 15:23 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 3/3] libbpf: Remove use of bpf_map_is_offload_neutral David Ahern
2022-04-23 21:35 ` [PATCH iproute2-next 0/3] Address more libbpf deprecations Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-05-02 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmdY9dLilPrHxz3Y@Laptop-X1 \
--to=haliu@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@isovalent.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox