From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9A8C433EF for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1356533AbiD0BAk (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:00:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42034 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1356453AbiD0BAj (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Apr 2022 21:00:39 -0400 Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F365E2DD5E; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:57:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1651021051; x=1682557051; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ZcuTdMRt4Sh+aF1R4ZTUZYM3s8YXeD0K6R2AxevhatU=; b=PKVpoChhpfqVoxbThACbh4L8EnmS2a2u8Vu3yQ4N/Yk5604OMQzv9g8W g93I7SvJGTb/j0Sa3qEkhlJiGZ6J02qv5eaPun2h+Ptqo7iZDyx6Ltg5W 8zOCMj64BU/FBpRQmsYYoQL286gvHm6puty8TnlolpwGVClLdXDI6JhaV yWnFJiXdjSIovdO2J61nWquY+Sd0d3Crun/nzAnWGabGuN34p3P5EicqE UD/dvhU8rZ8jcURB/iVOi8k9jhtSKKR37EvnhzbwnzFYmjebYmTd5Ou2P OABc4/39V5BVhKVI+xuar4cM+5vIZq5T5zA9QU3R3AwpHvTYYdx8UYwEW A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10329"; a="246337157" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,292,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="246337157" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Apr 2022 17:57:18 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.90,292,1643702400"; d="scan'208";a="650457655" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 5056e131ad90) ([10.239.97.150]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Apr 2022 17:57:15 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 5056e131ad90 with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1njVzW-00048Y-Dy; Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:57:14 +0000 Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 08:57:08 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Duoming Zhou , krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, pabeni@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com, broonie@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linma@zju.edu.cn, Duoming Zhou Subject: [RFC PATCH] nfc: nfcmrvl: main: nfc_download can be static Message-ID: References: <20220426155911.77761-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220426155911.77761-1-duoming@zju.edu.cn> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org net/nfc/core.c:28:6: warning: symbol 'nfc_download' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- net/nfc/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c index da8199f67d42c..9035935e93d80 100644 --- a/net/nfc/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/core.c @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ #define NFC_CHECK_PRES_FREQ_MS 2000 int nfc_devlist_generation; -bool nfc_download; +static bool nfc_download; DEFINE_MUTEX(nfc_devlist_mutex); /* NFC device ID bitmap */