* [PATCH] Documentation/bindings: net: fix sfp mod-def0 signal
@ 2022-06-06 9:18 Angelo Dureghello
2022-06-06 12:39 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Angelo Dureghello @ 2022-06-06 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, pabeni; +Cc: rmk+kernel, netdev, Angelo Dureghello
Checked both by driver code and functionally, module plug works
when gpio is set as GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@timesys.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
index 832139919f20..101a025a0c0f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Required properties:
Optional Properties:
- mod-def0-gpios : GPIO phandle and a specifier of the MOD-DEF0 (AKA Mod_ABS)
- module presence input gpio signal, active (module absent) high. Must
+ module presence input gpio signal, active (module absent) low. Must
not be present for SFF modules
- los-gpios : GPIO phandle and a specifier of the Receiver Loss of Signal
--
2.36.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Documentation/bindings: net: fix sfp mod-def0 signal
2022-06-06 9:18 [PATCH] Documentation/bindings: net: fix sfp mod-def0 signal Angelo Dureghello
@ 2022-06-06 12:39 ` Andrew Lunn
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lunn @ 2022-06-06 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Angelo Dureghello; +Cc: davem, pabeni, rmk+kernel, netdev
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 11:18:52AM +0200, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
> Checked both by driver code and functionally, module plug works
> when gpio is set as GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW.
>
> Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <angelo.dureghello@timesys.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> index 832139919f20..101a025a0c0f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/sff,sfp.txt
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Required properties:
> Optional Properties:
>
> - mod-def0-gpios : GPIO phandle and a specifier of the MOD-DEF0 (AKA Mod_ABS)
> - module presence input gpio signal, active (module absent) high. Must
> + module presence input gpio signal, active (module absent) low. Must
> not be present for SFF modules
INF-8074.pdf, "Table 1, Pin Function Definitions", says
Note 3, Grounded in Module.
and Note 3 says:
3) Mod-Def 0,1,2. These are the module definition pins. They
should be pulled up with a 4.7K – 10KΩ resistor on the host
board. The pull-up voltage shall be VccT or VccR (see Section
IV for further details). Mod-Def 0 is grounded by the module
to indicate that the module is present
So when the module is absent, the pullup on the board will mean the
GPIO is high.
NACK.
Please check you don't have an inverter in the path for your board.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-06 12:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-06 9:18 [PATCH] Documentation/bindings: net: fix sfp mod-def0 signal Angelo Dureghello
2022-06-06 12:39 ` Andrew Lunn
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).