From: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [doc] msg_zerocopy.rst: clarify the TCP shutdown scenario
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2022 16:01:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ypfvs+VsNHWQKT6H@fractal.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSeCC=sKJhKEnavLA7qdwbGz=MC1wqFPoJQA04mZBqebow@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1328 bytes --]
Hi Willem,
On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 09:24:32AM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:48 PM Frederik Deweerdt
> <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Based on my understanding, retransmissions of zero copied buffers can
> > happen after `close(2)`, the patch below amends the docs to suggest how
> > notifications should be handled in that case.
>
> Not just retransmissions. The first transmission similarly may be queued.
>
> >
[...]
> > @@ -144,6 +144,10 @@ the socket. A socket that has an error queued would normally block
> > other operations until the error is read. Zerocopy notifications have
> > a zero error code, however, to not block send and recv calls.
> >
> > +For protocols like TCP, where retransmissions can occur after the
> > +application is done with a given connection, applications should signal
> > +the close to the peer via shutdown(2), and keep polling the error queue
> > +until all transmissions have completed.
>
> A socket must not be closed until all completion notifications have
> been received.
>
> Calling shutdown is an optional step. It may be sufficient to simply
> delay close.
Thank you for the feedback, that helps!
What do you think of the attached patch?
Frederik
Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
commit 3218d973b68bc6d9f88d9e2374f3ada3df5ee7ff
Author: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 31 18:23:54 2022 -0700
[doc] msg_zerocopy.rst: clarify the TCP shutdown scenario
Explicitly mention that applications shouldn't be calling `close(2)` on
a TCP socket without draining the error queue.
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/msg_zerocopy.rst b/Documentation/networking/msg_zerocopy.rst
index 15920db8d35d..9373631d0a82 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/msg_zerocopy.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/msg_zerocopy.rst
@@ -144,6 +144,11 @@ the socket. A socket that has an error queued would normally block
other operations until the error is read. Zerocopy notifications have
a zero error code, however, to not block send and recv calls.
+For protocols like TCP, transmissions can occur after the application
+has called close(2). In cases where it's undesirable to delay calling
+close(2) until all notifications have been processed, the application
+can use shutdown(2), and keep polling the error queue until all
+transmissions have completed.
Notification Batching
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-01 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-01 2:47 [PATCH] [doc] msg_zerocopy.rst: clarify the TCP shutdown scenario Frederik Deweerdt
2022-06-01 13:24 ` Willem de Bruijn
2022-06-01 23:01 ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2022-06-02 0:29 ` Willem de Bruijn
2022-06-03 13:09 ` David Laight
2022-06-03 13:30 ` Willem de Bruijn
2022-06-06 7:58 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ypfvs+VsNHWQKT6H@fractal.lan \
--to=frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).