* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 7:40 ` [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ Jason Wang
@ 2022-06-14 13:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-15 1:32 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-14 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-14 16:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-06-14 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, cristian.marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > >
> > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > >
> > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > >
> > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > >
> > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > >
> > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > or anything I missed?
> > >
> > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
>
> Adding maintainers.
>
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
>
> It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
>
> > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
>
> A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
How about we just add an explicit ready in the driver anyway?
I think the implicit ready is just creating a mess as people
tend to forget to think about it.
> > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
>
> It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
>
> But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
>
> And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> something we need to fix.
>
> > arm_scmi
>
> It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
>
> /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
>
> So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
>
> > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >
>
> This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
>
> This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> be exploited.
>
> It requires more thoughts.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > >
> > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > >
> > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > no)?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > exactly
> > > > >
> > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > >
> > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > >
> > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > >
> > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > >
> > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > >
> > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > >
> > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > >
> > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 13:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-15 1:32 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-15 1:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, cristian.marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:50 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > >
> > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > >
> > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > >
> > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> >
> > Adding maintainers.
> >
> > >
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> >
> > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> >
> > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> >
> > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
>
> How about we just add an explicit ready in the driver anyway?
> I think the implicit ready is just creating a mess as people
> tend to forget to think about it.
This is possible, and we could fail the probe if ready is not set by a driver.
Thanks
>
> > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> >
> > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> >
> > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> >
> > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > something we need to fix.
> >
> > > arm_scmi
> >
> > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> >
> > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> >
> > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> >
> > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > >
> >
> > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> >
> > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > be exploited.
> >
> > It requires more thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > no)?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > exactly
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > >
> > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > >
> > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > >
> > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > if (err)
> > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 7:40 ` [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ Jason Wang
2022-06-14 13:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-14 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-15 1:38 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-14 16:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-06-14 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, cristian.marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > >
> > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > >
> > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > >
> > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > >
> > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > >
> > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > or anything I missed?
> > >
> > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
>
> Adding maintainers.
>
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
>
> It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
>
> > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
>
> A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
>
> > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
>
> It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
>
> But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
>
> And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> something we need to fix.
>
> > arm_scmi
>
> It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
>
> /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
>
> So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
>
> > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> >
>
> This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
>
> This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> be exploited.
>
> It requires more thoughts.
>
> Thanks
I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > >
> > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > >
> > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > no)?
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > exactly
> > > > >
> > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > >
> > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > >
> > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > >
> > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > >
> > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > >
> > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > >
> > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > >
> > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > if (err)
> > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-15 1:38 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-16 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-15 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, cristian.marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > >
> > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > >
> > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > >
> > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> >
> > Adding maintainers.
> >
> > >
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> >
> > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> >
> > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> >
> > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> >
> > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> >
> > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> >
> > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> >
> > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > something we need to fix.
> >
> > > arm_scmi
> >
> > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> >
> > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> >
> > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> >
> > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > >
> >
> > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> >
> > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > be exploited.
> >
> > It requires more thoughts.
> >
> > Thanks
>
> I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
> get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
> on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
> commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
I think it should be ok.
If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in
this release?
(Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline
instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports
are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not
related to hardening itself)
Thanks
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
vq->we_own_ring = true;
vq->notify = notify;
vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
- vq->broken = true;
+ vq->broken = false;
vq->last_used_idx = 0;
vq->event_triggered = false;
vq->num_added = 0;
>
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > no)?
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > exactly
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > >
> > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > >
> > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > >
> > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > >
> > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > if (err)
> > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-15 1:38 ` Jason Wang
@ 2022-06-16 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-17 1:24 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-06-16 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, cristian.marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > > >
> > > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> > >
> > > Adding maintainers.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > >
> > > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> > >
> > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > >
> > > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> > >
> > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > >
> > > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> > >
> > > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> > >
> > > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > > something we need to fix.
> > >
> > > > arm_scmi
> > >
> > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > >
> > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > >
> > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > >
> > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > > >
> > >
> > > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> > >
> > > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > > be exploited.
> > >
> > > It requires more thoughts.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> > I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
> > get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
> > on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
> > commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
>
> I think it should be ok.
>
> If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in
> this release?
>
> (Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline
> instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports
> are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not
> related to hardening itself)
Absolutely. Question is do you think we can fix everything by the
release? At least for rpmsg we don't seem to have a handle on it yet.
> Thanks
>
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> vq->we_own_ring = true;
> vq->notify = notify;
> vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> - vq->broken = true;
> + vq->broken = false;
> vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> vq->event_triggered = false;
> vq->num_added = 0;
and drop it on reset?
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > > >
> > > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > > no)?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > > if (err)
> > > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-16 17:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-17 1:24 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-17 5:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-17 1:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, Cristian Marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> > > >
> > > > Adding maintainers.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > >
> > > > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > > > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > > > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > > > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > > > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> > > >
> > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > >
> > > > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > > > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > > > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> > > >
> > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > >
> > > > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> > > >
> > > > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > > > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > > > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > > > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > > > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> > > >
> > > > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > > > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > > > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > > > something we need to fix.
> > > >
> > > > > arm_scmi
> > > >
> > > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > > >
> > > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > > >
> > > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > > >
> > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > > > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > > > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> > > >
> > > > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > > > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > > > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > > > be exploited.
> > > >
> > > > It requires more thoughts.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > > I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
> > > get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
> > > on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
> > > commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
> >
> > I think it should be ok.
> >
> > If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in
> > this release?
> >
> > (Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline
> > instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports
> > are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not
> > related to hardening itself)
>
>
> Absolutely. Question is do you think we can fix everything by the
> release?
Probably not, I'm auditing all the virtio drivers and it seems we have
many issues:
1) race between subsystem registration/use and virtio_device_ready()
2) race between notifications and subsystem registerstiation/use
And it looks to me even virtio-net has this race.
So I think I will post a patch to disable this like below for this release.
> At least for rpmsg we don't seem to have a handle on it yet.
Yes.
>
>
> > Thanks
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > vq->notify = notify;
> > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > - vq->broken = true;
> > + vq->broken = false;
> > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > vq->num_added = 0;
>
>
> and drop it on reset?
Right.
Thanks
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > > > no)?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > > > if (err)
> > > > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-17 1:24 ` Jason Wang
@ 2022-06-17 5:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-17 7:26 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2022-06-17 5:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, Cristian Marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:24:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > Adding maintainers.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > > > > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > > > > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > > > > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > > > > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > >
> > > > > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > > > > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > > > > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> > > > >
> > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > >
> > > > > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> > > > >
> > > > > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > > > > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > > > > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > > > > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > > > > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> > > > >
> > > > > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > > > > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > > > > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > > > > something we need to fix.
> > > > >
> > > > > > arm_scmi
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > > > >
> > > > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > > > >
> > > > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > > > >
> > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > > > > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > > > > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> > > > >
> > > > > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > > > > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > > > > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > > > > be exploited.
> > > > >
> > > > > It requires more thoughts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
> > > > get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
> > > > on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
> > > > commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
> > >
> > > I think it should be ok.
> > >
> > > If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in
> > > this release?
> > >
> > > (Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline
> > > instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports
> > > are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not
> > > related to hardening itself)
> >
> >
> > Absolutely. Question is do you think we can fix everything by the
> > release?
>
> Probably not, I'm auditing all the virtio drivers and it seems we have
> many issues:
>
> 1) race between subsystem registration/use and virtio_device_ready()
> 2) race between notifications and subsystem registerstiation/use
>
> And it looks to me even virtio-net has this race.
Interesting. How does it look for virtio-net?
> So I think I will post a patch to disable this like below for this release.
However please do post patches that add device_ready as appropriate.
This is basic spec compliance.
Also do you think we should do a full revert? Maybe a Kconfig option is
ok for now.
> > At least for rpmsg we don't seem to have a handle on it yet.
>
> Yes.
>
> >
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > - vq->broken = true;
> > > + vq->broken = false;
> > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > vq->num_added = 0;
> >
> >
> > and drop it on reset?
>
> Right.
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > > > > no)?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > > > > if (err)
> > > > > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-17 5:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-17 7:26 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-17 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-17 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, Cristian Marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:36 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:24:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yes.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > > > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adding maintainers.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > > > > > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > > > > > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > > > > > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > > > > > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > > > > > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > > > > > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > > > > > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > > > > > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > > > > > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > > > > > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > > > > > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > > > > > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > > > > > something we need to fix.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > arm_scmi
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > > > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > > > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > > > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > > > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling
> > > > > > is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And
> > > > > > it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately
> > > > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we
> > > > > > do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a
> > > > > > race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could
> > > > > > be exploited.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It requires more thoughts.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > I think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not
> > > > > get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work
> > > > > on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can
> > > > > commit to a full fix in the next linux version?
> > > >
> > > > I think it should be ok.
> > > >
> > > > If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in
> > > > this release?
> > > >
> > > > (Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline
> > > > instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports
> > > > are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not
> > > > related to hardening itself)
> > >
> > >
> > > Absolutely. Question is do you think we can fix everything by the
> > > release?
> >
> > Probably not, I'm auditing all the virtio drivers and it seems we have
> > many issues:
> >
> > 1) race between subsystem registration/use and virtio_device_ready()
> > 2) race between notifications and subsystem registerstiation/use
> >
> > And it looks to me even virtio-net has this race.
>
> Interesting. How does it look for virtio-net?
Will post a patch soon.
>
> > So I think I will post a patch to disable this like below for this release.
>
>
> However please do post patches that add device_ready as appropriate.
> This is basic spec compliance.
Working on this.
>
> Also do you think we should do a full revert? Maybe a Kconfig option is
> ok for now.
Yes, Kconfig should be fine.
Patch will be posted soon.
Thanks
>
>
> > > At least for rpmsg we don't seem to have a handle on it yet.
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > - vq->broken = true;
> > > > + vq->broken = false;
> > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > >
> > >
> > > and drop it on reset?
> >
> > Right.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > If not, we need to clarify it in the spec
> > > > > > > > > > > and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > hmm, i don't get what we need to clarify
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > E.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the
> > > > > > > > > device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think
> > > > > > > > > no)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > me the code is correct.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The above looks fine and we have three more:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Same comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the
> > > > > > > > > > > > device once it's registered?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It depends on the specific subsystem.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling
> > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be
> > > > > > > > > > > fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if
> > > > > > > > > > > ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after
> > > > > > > > > > > netdev_register() seems to be fine.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > exactly
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the
> > > > > > > > > > > subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to
> > > > > > > > > > > proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after
> > > > > > > > > > > DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Kick itself is not blocked.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback
> > > > > > > > > instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Then we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue
> > > > > > > > > (or device to driver queue), we are fine:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > E.g in virtio-blk:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(vdev);
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups);
> > > > > > > > > if (err)
> > > > > > > > > goto out_cleanup_disk;
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->flags = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->count = sizeof(status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * completed before ssch.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (ret)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * interrupt for this line arriving after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * vq->broken as true.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_break_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->reset(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_enabled = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config_change_pending = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_reset_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * driver.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* We should never be setting status to 0. */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status == 0);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before writing to the MMIO region.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed(
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - if (unlikely(vq->broken))
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) {
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK");
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + return IRQ_NONE;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->event)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->we_own_ring = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->notify = notify;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - vq->broken = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + vq->broken = true;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->last_used_idx = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->event_triggered = false;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vq->num_added = 0;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and make this conditional
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > @@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt()
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + /*
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * specific set_status() method.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + *
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + * we won't lose any notification.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + */
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-17 7:26 ` Jason Wang
@ 2022-06-17 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2022-06-17 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic, Cornelia Huck,
eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, Cristian Marussi,
sudeep.holla, Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 03:26:16PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:36 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:24:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
Guys; have you heard about trimming emails on reply?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 7:40 ` [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ Jason Wang
2022-06-14 13:50 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-06-14 15:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2022-06-14 16:46 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-15 1:41 ` Jason Wang
2 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2022-06-14 16:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic,
Cornelia Huck, eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, sudeep.holla,
Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
Hi Jason,
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > >
> > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > >
> > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > >
> > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > >
> > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > >
> > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > or anything I missed?
> > >
> > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
>
> Adding maintainers.
>
> >
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
>
> It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
>
> > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
>
> A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
>
> > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
>
> It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
>
> But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
>
> And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> something we need to fix.
>
> > arm_scmi
>
> It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
>
> /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
>
> So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
>
I wanted to give it a go at this series testing it on the context of
SCMI but it does not apply
- not on a v5.18:
17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.18
17:33 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
Applying: virtio: use virtio_reset_device() when possible
Applying: virtio: introduce config op to synchronize vring callbacks
Applying: virtio-pci: implement synchronize_cbs()
Applying: virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c:345
error: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0005 virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
- neither on a v5.19-rc2:
17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.19-rc2
17:35 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio.c:526
error: drivers/virtio/virtio.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in
virtio_device_restore()
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
... what I should take as base ?
Thanks,
Cristian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-14 16:46 ` Cristian Marussi
@ 2022-06-15 1:41 ` Jason Wang
2022-06-15 18:24 ` Cristian Marussi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-15 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cristian Marussi
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic,
Cornelia Huck, eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, sudeep.holla,
Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:46 AM Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > that is used by some device such as virtio-blk
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) done only for PCI transport
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ
> > > > > > > > > > > > > hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return
> > > > > > > > > > > > > when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent
> > > > > > > > > > > > > IRQ storm.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > expensive.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening -
> > > > > > > > > > > > this will be a debugging aid and a work around for
> > > > > > > > > > > > users if we find more buggy drivers.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > suppress_interrupt_hardening ?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it
> > > > > > > > > > > won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug
> > > > > > > > > > > report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we
> > > > > > > > > > > simply warn instead of disable it by default.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver.
> > > > > > > > > > For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready?
> > > > > > > > > > I found 5 of these:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.c
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of
> > > > > > > > work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after
> > > > > > > > it's registered?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > it's not allowed to kick
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > If yes,
> > > > > > > the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK
> > > > > > > for a well behaved device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.
> > > > >
> > > > > For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > So for virtio bt, it works like:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) driver queue buffer and kick
> > > > > 2) driver set DRIVER_OK
> > > > > 3) device start to process the buffer
> > > > > 4) device send an notification
> > > > >
> > > > > The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK,
> > > > > or anything I missed?
> > > >
> > > > btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in
> > > > hdev->open, so we're probably fine here.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Sounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)
> >
> > Adding maintainers.
> >
> > >
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
> >
> > It looks to me the device could be used immediately after
> > i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add
> > virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in
> > i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the
> > i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().
> >
> > > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> >
> > A networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to
> > refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So
> > it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().
> >
> > > drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
> >
> > It doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening.
> >
> > But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after
> > nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued
> > before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have
> > a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called
> > after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating.
> >
> > And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of
> > provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before
> > the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is
> > something we need to fix.
> >
> > > arm_scmi
> >
> > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> >
> > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> >
> > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> >
>
> I wanted to give it a go at this series testing it on the context of
> SCMI but it does not apply
>
> - not on a v5.18:
>
> 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.18
> 17:33 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> Applying: virtio: use virtio_reset_device() when possible
> Applying: virtio: introduce config op to synchronize vring callbacks
> Applying: virtio-pci: implement synchronize_cbs()
> Applying: virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
> error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c:345
> error: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0005 virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
>
> - neither on a v5.19-rc2:
>
> 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.19-rc2
> 17:35 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio.c:526
> error: drivers/virtio/virtio.c: patch does not apply
> Patch failed at 0001 virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in
> virtio_device_restore()
> hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
>
> ... what I should take as base ?
It should have already been included in rc2, so there's no need to
apply patch manually.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-15 1:41 ` Jason Wang
@ 2022-06-15 18:24 ` Cristian Marussi
2022-06-17 3:14 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2022-06-15 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Wang
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic,
Cornelia Huck, eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, sudeep.holla,
Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:41:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:46 AM Cristian Marussi
> <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
Hi Jason,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> >
[snip]
> > >
> > > > arm_scmi
> > >
> > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > >
> > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > >
> > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > >
> >
> > I wanted to give it a go at this series testing it on the context of
> > SCMI but it does not apply
> >
> > - not on a v5.18:
> >
> > 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.18
> > 17:33 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> > Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> > Applying: virtio: use virtio_reset_device() when possible
> > Applying: virtio: introduce config op to synchronize vring callbacks
> > Applying: virtio-pci: implement synchronize_cbs()
> > Applying: virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
> > error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c:345
> > error: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c: patch does not apply
> > Patch failed at 0005 virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
> >
> > - neither on a v5.19-rc2:
> >
> > 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.19-rc2
> > 17:35 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> > Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> > error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio.c:526
> > error: drivers/virtio/virtio.c: patch does not apply
> > Patch failed at 0001 virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in
> > virtio_device_restore()
> > hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> > When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> >
> > ... what I should take as base ?
>
> It should have already been included in rc2, so there's no need to
> apply patch manually.
>
I tested this series as included in v5.19-rc2 (WITHOUT adding a virtio_device_ready
in SCMI virtio as you mentioned above ... if I got it right) and I have NOT seen any
issue around SCMI virtio using my usual test setup (using both SCMI vqueues).
No anomalies even when using SCMI virtio in atomic/polling mode.
Adding a virtio_device_ready() at the end of the SCMI virtio probe()
works fine either, it does not make any difference in my setup.
(both using QEMU and kvmtool with this latter NOT supporting
virtio_V1...not sure if it makes a difference but I thought was worth
mentioning)
Thanks,
Cristian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
2022-06-15 18:24 ` Cristian Marussi
@ 2022-06-17 3:14 ` Jason Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Jason Wang @ 2022-06-17 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cristian Marussi
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, virtualization, linux-kernel, Thomas Gleixner,
Peter Zijlstra, Paul E. McKenney, Marc Zyngier, Halil Pasic,
Cornelia Huck, eperezma, Cindy Lu, Stefano Garzarella, Xuan Zhuo,
Vineeth Vijayan, Peter Oberparleiter, linux-s390, conghui.chen,
Viresh Kumar, netdev, pankaj.gupta.linux, sudeep.holla,
Bjorn Andersson, Mathieu Poirier
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 2:24 AM Cristian Marussi
<cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:41:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:46 AM Cristian Marussi
> > <cristian.marussi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
>
> [snip]
>
> > > >
> > > > > arm_scmi
> > > >
> > > > It looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after
> > > >
> > > > /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
> > > > smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
> > > >
> > > > So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an
> > > > optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment,
> > > > so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered
> > > > after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I wanted to give it a go at this series testing it on the context of
> > > SCMI but it does not apply
> > >
> > > - not on a v5.18:
> > >
> > > 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.18
> > > 17:33 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> > > Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> > > Applying: virtio: use virtio_reset_device() when possible
> > > Applying: virtio: introduce config op to synchronize vring callbacks
> > > Applying: virtio-pci: implement synchronize_cbs()
> > > Applying: virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
> > > error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c:345
> > > error: drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c: patch does not apply
> > > Patch failed at 0005 virtio-mmio: implement synchronize_cbs()
> > >
> > > - neither on a v5.19-rc2:
> > >
> > > 17:33 $ git rebase -i v5.19-rc2
> > > 17:35 $ git am ./v6_20220527_jasowang_rework_on_the_irq_hardening_of_virtio.mbx
> > > Applying: virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in virtio_device_restore()
> > > error: patch failed: drivers/virtio/virtio.c:526
> > > error: drivers/virtio/virtio.c: patch does not apply
> > > Patch failed at 0001 virtio: use virtio_device_ready() in
> > > virtio_device_restore()
> > > hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
> > > When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
> > >
> > > ... what I should take as base ?
> >
> > It should have already been included in rc2, so there's no need to
> > apply patch manually.
> >
>
> I tested this series as included in v5.19-rc2 (WITHOUT adding a virtio_device_ready
> in SCMI virtio as you mentioned above ... if I got it right) and I have NOT seen any
> issue around SCMI virtio using my usual test setup (using both SCMI vqueues).
>
> No anomalies even when using SCMI virtio in atomic/polling mode.
>
> Adding a virtio_device_ready() at the end of the SCMI virtio probe()
> works fine either, it does not make any difference in my setup.
> (both using QEMU and kvmtool with this latter NOT supporting
> virtio_V1...not sure if it makes a difference but I thought was worth
> mentioning)
Thanks a lot for the testing.
We want to prevent malicious hypervisors from attacking us. So more questions:
Assuming we do:
virtio_device_ready();
/* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
This means we allow the callbacks (scmi_vio_complete) to be called
before smp_store_mb(). We need to make sure the callbacks are robust.
And this looks fine since we have the check of
scmi_vio_channel_acquire() and if the notification is called before
smp_store_mb(), the acquire will fail.
If we put virtio_device_ready() after smp_store_mb() like:
/* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */
smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev);
virtio_device_ready();
If I understand correctly, there will be a race since the SCMI may try
to use the device before virtio_device_ready(), this violates the
virtio spec somehow.
Thanks
>
> Thanks,
> Cristian
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread