From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to 281d0c962752 ("fortify: Add Clang support")
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:00:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrM8kC5zXzZgL/ca@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjmREcirYi4k_CBT+2U8X5VOAjQn0tVD28OdcKJKpA0zg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:19:31AM -0500, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 10:08 AM Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, true. I had to check to find out its from the memcpy() in check_image_valid().
>
> Funky but true - I can reproduce it, and just commenting out that
> memcpy fixes the warning.
>
> And I see nothing wrong with that code - it's copying a 'struct
> fw_section_info_st' between two other structs that seem to have arrays
> that are appropriately sized.
imho, there is no check for 'i' and it can become more than MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM and
in that case it will overwrite.
This fixes the error for me and I think will also address the concern that
clang is raising.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c
index 60ae8bfc5f69..bc4b3ec15925 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_devlink.c
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static bool check_image_valid(struct hinic_devlink_priv *priv, const u8 *buf,
return false;
}
- for (i = 0; i < fw_image->fw_info.fw_section_cnt; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < fw_image->fw_info.fw_section_cnt && i < MAX_FW_TYPE_NUM; i++) {
len += fw_image->fw_section_info[i].fw_section_len;
memcpy(&host_image->image_section_info[i],
&fw_image->fw_section_info[i],
--
Regards
Sudip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-22 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-22 10:23 mainline build failure due to 281d0c962752 ("fortify: Add Clang support") Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-22 13:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-22 15:01 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-22 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-22 17:26 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-22 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-22 22:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-06-22 18:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-22 15:08 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2022-06-22 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-22 16:00 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2022-06-22 16:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-06-22 16:16 ` Sudip Mukherjee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrM8kC5zXzZgL/ca@debian \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).