From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EB8C433EF for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234699AbiGMJ4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:56:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50900 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230398AbiGMJ4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2022 05:56:30 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09A49B8EBF; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id BD48EC01E; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:56:28 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1657706188; bh=pjiAEa60Alkw3UWG+MQjG9CTRo60uCCBhIdRs0otWFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oWmdA5i9zqTEWirP6yj0ZQ3tI3n/29ATEa6esdIR5yvp+HITlzHeZDdnhHCUQUJQ3 FmCJH4GdJAYSJ3KP5H6961KfFSk/4PQZkZjlBvIvMn1Wg/foE8TYp6EzjLls1OrgfP Rp+O+p+nIoJ0wtGMYNFwmv3kuKVaztM2Rmww0apJCX2vbXKH0JaEebdnwOMLlJKNKy CbGBO4reBCOoTXx7bucrX3VKfo0cP5kxUOhRqq8yBZGgEAOVIFGcrrcHpjyURCZQ0p S69LhEvNNr9PhuQ+zsJUeiiBwjXJdab0pGmLbW8Od3TykW0XgEIscpPQ/cClMT1ViP 9tUSyiZNkvQrA== Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8981C009; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 11:56:25 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1657706188; bh=pjiAEa60Alkw3UWG+MQjG9CTRo60uCCBhIdRs0otWFc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=oWmdA5i9zqTEWirP6yj0ZQ3tI3n/29ATEa6esdIR5yvp+HITlzHeZDdnhHCUQUJQ3 FmCJH4GdJAYSJ3KP5H6961KfFSk/4PQZkZjlBvIvMn1Wg/foE8TYp6EzjLls1OrgfP Rp+O+p+nIoJ0wtGMYNFwmv3kuKVaztM2Rmww0apJCX2vbXKH0JaEebdnwOMLlJKNKy CbGBO4reBCOoTXx7bucrX3VKfo0cP5kxUOhRqq8yBZGgEAOVIFGcrrcHpjyURCZQ0p S69LhEvNNr9PhuQ+zsJUeiiBwjXJdab0pGmLbW8Od3TykW0XgEIscpPQ/cClMT1ViP 9tUSyiZNkvQrA== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 1435d5b7; Wed, 13 Jul 2022 09:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 18:56:08 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Christian Schoenebeck Cc: Latchesar Ionkov , Eric Van Hensbergen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Nikolay Kichukov Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH v5 11/11] net/9p: allocate appropriate reduced message buffers Message-ID: References: <4284956.GYXQZuIPEp@silver> <1998718.eTOXZt5M9a@silver> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1998718.eTOXZt5M9a@silver> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 11:29:13AM +0200: > > As this flag is going to be very RDMA-transport specific, I'm still > > scratching my head for a good name though. > > Or, instead of inventing some exotic flag name, maybe introducing an enum for > the individual 9p transport types? That works for me as well -- Dominique