From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: add BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE flag for BPF_PROG_LOAD
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:56:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YswB3CebEK0ltAwt@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220711083220.2175036-3-asavkov@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:32:18AM +0200, Artem Savkov wrote:
> Add a BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE will be required to be supplied to
> BPF_PROG_LOAD for programs to utilize destructive helpers such as
> bpf_panic().
I'd think that having kernel.destructive_bpf_enabled sysctl knob enabled
would be enough to enable that helper from any program, not sure having
extra load flag adds more security
jirka
>
> Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++++++
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 4 +++-
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index 77972724bed7..43c008e3587a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1041,6 +1041,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
> bool sleepable;
> bool tail_call_reachable;
> bool xdp_has_frags;
> + bool destructive;
> bool use_bpf_prog_pack;
> /* BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTO for valid attach_btf_id */
> const struct btf_type *attach_func_proto;
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index e81362891596..4423874b5da4 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,12 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
> */
> #define BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS (1U << 5)
>
> +/* If BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the loaded program
> + * will be able to perform destructive operations such as calling bpf_panic()
> + * helper.
> + */
> +#define BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE (1U << 6)
> +
> /* link_create.kprobe_multi.flags used in LINK_CREATE command for
> * BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI attach type to create return probe.
> */
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 1ce6541d90e1..779feac2dc7d 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -2449,7 +2449,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
> BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ |
> BPF_F_SLEEPABLE |
> BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 |
> - BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS))
> + BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS |
> + BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) &&
> @@ -2536,6 +2537,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_load(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
> prog->aux->offload_requested = !!attr->prog_ifindex;
> prog->aux->sleepable = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
> prog->aux->xdp_has_frags = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS;
> + prog->aux->destructive = attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE;
>
> err = security_bpf_prog_alloc(prog->aux);
> if (err)
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index e81362891596..4423874b5da4 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -1121,6 +1121,12 @@ enum bpf_link_type {
> */
> #define BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS (1U << 5)
>
> +/* If BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE is used in BPF_PROG_LOAD command, the loaded program
> + * will be able to perform destructive operations such as calling bpf_panic()
> + * helper.
> + */
> +#define BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE (1U << 6)
> +
> /* link_create.kprobe_multi.flags used in LINK_CREATE command for
> * BPF_TRACE_KPROBE_MULTI attach type to create return probe.
> */
> --
> 2.35.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-11 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-11 8:32 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf_panic() helper Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 8:32 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: add a sysctl to enable destructive bpf helpers Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 8:32 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: add BPF_F_DESTRUCTIVE flag for BPF_PROG_LOAD Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 10:56 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-07-11 11:48 ` Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 8:32 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: add bpf_panic() helper Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 10:42 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-07-12 17:53 ` Song Liu
2022-07-12 18:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-13 13:31 ` Artem Savkov
2022-07-13 22:20 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-15 12:52 ` Artem Savkov
2022-07-18 21:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-11 8:32 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: bpf_panic selftest Artem Savkov
2022-07-11 10:51 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf_panic() helper Jiri Olsa
2022-08-01 13:58 ` Daniel Vacek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YswB3CebEK0ltAwt@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox