From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB415C43334 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 22:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230446AbiGOWbL (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:31:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35488 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230218AbiGOWbK (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:31:10 -0400 Received: from nautica.notk.org (nautica.notk.org [91.121.71.147]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050A157E01; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nautica.notk.org (Postfix, from userid 108) id AB30DC01E; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:31:05 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1657924265; bh=XVWBfw25/xbELFTjDfF1NZ0Lppo6CvFhF/8lmkwM8Tc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=y0l4aIPQuM9ZuawOHbdnwDk2TF9dPuWBEvzrKzLGpgTjDHRIR5EPAJ1nCZxP/YrNs +P/2ivp8/TZfFF2FCnBQNbCdY3YDNCuYARBr9mHvUFcfAHCHbDAXqb8dXNDCEZN2mI wrDPZFLmS+8ve8bObhvJ1FKnEFkR7hWTJjs47IsmOfmXSr4DGddEqjhbiGci/o08hC aREWswUGHyxqC5kFlObTLWEcsuXor8e96Uq2HWr3U9alT6+oq0zrUSr4r1yGAYkSqK AF9MGHg9cCGbUdpdFhbhHDgoCTkmk0EUvywYo5fORRxPo+IjhcXbiDEOTQwumHDCR8 CVGYduC+Luzvw== Received: from odin.codewreck.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nautica.notk.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2533C009; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 00:31:02 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codewreck.org; s=2; t=1657924265; bh=XVWBfw25/xbELFTjDfF1NZ0Lppo6CvFhF/8lmkwM8Tc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=y0l4aIPQuM9ZuawOHbdnwDk2TF9dPuWBEvzrKzLGpgTjDHRIR5EPAJ1nCZxP/YrNs +P/2ivp8/TZfFF2FCnBQNbCdY3YDNCuYARBr9mHvUFcfAHCHbDAXqb8dXNDCEZN2mI wrDPZFLmS+8ve8bObhvJ1FKnEFkR7hWTJjs47IsmOfmXSr4DGddEqjhbiGci/o08hC aREWswUGHyxqC5kFlObTLWEcsuXor8e96Uq2HWr3U9alT6+oq0zrUSr4r1yGAYkSqK AF9MGHg9cCGbUdpdFhbhHDgoCTkmk0EUvywYo5fORRxPo+IjhcXbiDEOTQwumHDCR8 CVGYduC+Luzvw== Received: from localhost (odin.codewreck.org [local]) by odin.codewreck.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 83975ade; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 22:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 07:30:45 +0900 From: Dominique Martinet To: Christian Schoenebeck Cc: v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Van Hensbergen , Latchesar Ionkov , Nikolay Kichukov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] remove msize limit in virtio transport Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 11:35:26PM +0200: > * Patches 7..11 tremendously reduce unnecessarily huge 9p message sizes and > therefore provide performance gain as well. So far, almost all 9p messages > simply allocated message buffers exactly msize large, even for messages > that actually just needed few bytes. So these patches make sense by > themselves, independent of this overall series, however for this series > even more, because the larger msize, the more this issue would have hurt > otherwise. Unless they got stuck somewhere the mails are missing patches 10 and 11, one too many 0s to git send-email ? I'll do a quick review from github commit meanwhile -- Dominique