From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Ravi Gunasekaran <r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kishon@ti.com,
vigneshr@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_mdio: Add workaround for errata i2329
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 02:30:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvRNpAdG7/edUEc+@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810111345.31200-1-r-gunasekaran@ti.com>
> +static int davinci_mdiobb_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy, int reg)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct mdiobb_ctrl *ctrl = bus->priv;
> + struct davinci_mdio_data *data;
> +
> + data = container_of(ctrl, struct davinci_mdio_data, bb_ctrl);
> +
> + if (phy & ~PHY_REG_MASK || reg & ~PHY_ID_MASK)
> + return -EINVAL;
You don't need this. Leave it up to the bit banging code to do the
validation. This also breaks C45, which the bit banging code can do,
and it looks like the hardware cannot.
> +
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(data->dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = mdiobb_read(bus, phy, reg);
> +
> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(data->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(data->dev);
Once you take the validation out, this function then all becomes about
runtime power management. Should the bit banging core actually be
doing this? It seems like it is something which could be useful for
other devices.
struct mii_bus has a parent member. If set, you could apply these run
time PM functions to that. Please add a patch to modify the core bit
banging code, and then you should be able to remove these helpers.
> static int davinci_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct mdio_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> @@ -340,12 +535,30 @@ static int davinci_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct phy_device *phy;
> int ret, addr;
> int autosuspend_delay_ms = -1;
> + const struct soc_device_attribute *soc_match_data;
netdev uses reverse christmas tree. Variables should be sorted longest
first, shortest last.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-11 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-10 11:13 [PATCH v2 net-next] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_mdio: Add workaround for errata i2329 Ravi Gunasekaran
2022-08-11 0:30 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2022-08-11 7:00 ` Ravi Gunasekaran
2022-08-11 12:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-12 4:36 ` Ravi Gunasekaran
2022-08-12 15:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-16 4:26 ` Ravi Gunasekaran
2022-08-13 0:57 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvRNpAdG7/edUEc+@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=r-gunasekaran@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).