From: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: update x->lastused for every packet
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 23:44:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvwPzdnyOCWR4UIx@moon.secunet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220816092736.GE2950045@gauss3.secunet.de>
Hi Steffen,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:27:36 +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 11:17:31AM +0200, Antony Antony wrote:
> > x->lastused was only updated for outgoing mobile IPv6 packet.
> > With this fix update it for every, in and out, packet.
> >
> > This is useful to check if the a SA is still in use, or when was
> > the last time an SA was used. lastused time of in SA can used
> > to check IPsec path is functional.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antony Antony <antony.antony@secunet.com>
>
> Your patch does not apply to current ipsec-next, please
> rebase.
>
> Thanks!
thanks for trying to apply this patch to ipsec-next.
I am happy to send a rebased patch, however I suspect ipsec is yet to be
merged into ipsec-next? Why didn't ipsec merge into to "net" before 6.0-rc1?
There is a related patch sitting in in ipsec:
717ada9f10f2 ("Revert "xfrm: update SA curlft.use_time""),
Once that is in ipsec-next this patch would apply.
Would you prefer a rebased patch?
regards,
-antony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-16 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-04 9:17 [PATCH ipsec-next] xfrm: update x->lastused for every packet Antony Antony
2022-08-16 9:27 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-08-16 21:44 ` Antony Antony [this message]
2022-08-17 10:16 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvwPzdnyOCWR4UIx@moon.secunet.de \
--to=antony.antony@secunet.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tobias@strongswan.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).