From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 12:56:16 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxm8QFvtMcpHWzIy@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1662295929.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
On Sun, Sep 04, 2022 at 04:15:34PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>
> Changelog:
> v4:
<...>
> * perf traces for crypto mode will come later.
Single core RX:
# Children Self Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ........ ............ ............. .................. .......................................
#
99.97% 0.00% 0 ksoftirqd/143 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] ret_from_fork
|
---ret_from_fork
kthread
smpboot_thread_fn
|
--99.96%--run_ksoftirqd
__do_softirq
|
--99.86%--net_rx_action
|
|--61.49%--mlx5e_napi_poll
| |
| |--58.43%--mlx5e_poll_rx_cq
| | |
| | --57.27%--mlx5e_handle_rx_cqe
| | |
| | |--33.05%--napi_gro_receive
| | | |
| | | --32.42%--dev_gro_receive
| | | |
| | | --29.64%--inet_gro_receive
| | | |
| | | --27.70%--esp4_gro_receive
| | | |
| | | --25.80%--xfrm_input
| | | |
| | | |--6.86%--xfrm4_transport_finish
| | | | |
| | | | |--4.19%--__memmove
| | | | |
| | | | --1.27%--ip_send_check
| | | |
| | | |--6.02%--esp_input_done2
| | | | |
| | | | --3.26%--skb_copy_bits
| | | | |
| | | | --2.50%--memcpy_erms
| | | |
| | | |--2.19%--_raw_spin_lock
| | | |
| | | |--1.22%--xfrm_rcv_cb
| | | | |
| | | | --0.68%--xfrm4_rcv_cb
| | | |
| | | |--0.97%--xfrm_inner_mode_input.isra.35
| | | |
| | | |--0.97%--gro_cells_receive
| | | |
| | | |--0.69%--esp_input_tail
| | | |
| | | --0.66%--xfrm_parse_spi
| | |
| | |--11.91%--mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_linear
| | | |
| | | --5.63%--build_skb
| | | |
| | | --3.82%--__build_skb
| | | |
| | | --1.97%--kmem_cache_alloc
| | |
| | --9.97%--mlx5e_build_rx_skb
| | |
| | --7.23%--mlx5e_ipsec_offload_handle_rx_skb
| | |
| | |--3.60%--secpath_set
| | | |
| | | --3.41%--skb_ext_add
| | | |
| | | --2.69%--__skb_ext_alloc
| | | |
| | | --2.58%--kmem_cache_alloc
| | | |
| | | --0.60%--__slab_alloc
| | | |
| | | --0.56%--___slab_alloc
| | |
| | --2.52%--mlx5e_ipsec_sadb_rx_lookup
| |
| --2.78%--mlx5e_post_rx_wqes
I have TX traces too and can add if RX are not sufficient.
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-08 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-04 13:15 [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 1/8] xfrm: add new full offload flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 2/8] xfrm: allow state full offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 3/8] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 4/8] xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec full offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-25 9:16 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-26 6:06 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-27 5:04 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 5/8] xfrm: add RX datapath protection " Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 6/8] xfrm: enforce separation between priorities of HW/SW policies Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-25 9:34 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-26 6:38 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-27 5:48 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-27 10:21 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-25 9:20 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-26 6:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-27 5:49 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-04 13:15 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 8/8] xfrm: document IPsec full offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-04 13:19 ` [PATCH RFC xfrm-next v3 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-08 9:56 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2022-09-21 14:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-21 17:37 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-25 9:40 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-26 6:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-27 5:59 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-09-27 10:02 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-19 9:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-22 7:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-22 7:35 ` Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yxm8QFvtMcpHWzIy@unreal \
--to=leonro@nvidia.com \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=raeds@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox