From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBC9ECAAA1 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 01:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229588AbiIPBjU (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 21:39:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57192 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229510AbiIPBjT (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 21:39:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x636.google.com (mail-pl1-x636.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::636]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FDF4054F for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x636.google.com with SMTP id s18so14090353plr.4 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:39:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4olRgDhsI5nQOVJRspipuq+EQBZGo/q5MF/2KuVRJ68=; b=Eg+tA2FUwxcK4ZmdF/9OJ3DPGYDU4c7pAre27wWFT3pCP4Cj8uOdE7yamhW/ZQCa3O CiDBfDJvoGUwgaI97DBjGa3xEY86n/B8rqveQpr2Neybjr10kuxV8SJdCKiQgg6Dvu0W M3oVJEA3F9EsHIyR6k5YJ3pt+cSjJM0QVZ97pPEJnvqPmjBrtbmHKgpG7CfpPEYq3wsx 9BKmspu6zF0vU4whQWfNQlw+LO+XzVrAmHGLALTfQIkOG1gu46V2n9iMs/3WOvCDDaIF OLnGU8jnFspcyOBtpPsESnd0VxlhvFgWdEoYlGiV24Zj+xMLdVgjl/bChO1URRVk1mxi rFQA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4olRgDhsI5nQOVJRspipuq+EQBZGo/q5MF/2KuVRJ68=; b=M1p1/mK8GzX0PXnrIA3CiZRsc5UlTUKRj4VXjU7ulwDTmhvHW0GqZy+5pjaJFKbTTx u1Dm2yfsw9D5cl9bNsH7AWzs1AIqyUABOpfFYZFJ3s3lb0AXZoCfuH0Tbo9IWi04sUbd HDIabFZhs3XxuYnnTumkxIE11pm93xdm05Uc7ITtlGwaY1bFX9UFZMKgoZLW37YxctmW PsDZ47TQq+XFSf62Fifii6LnqA02JXbwAkXPSkcboNNltRAG+4E7zIMKwRCk1w/6Jhn4 AOYfzeNC0JIgiJuRGbcnkEpA6Bo7zITixLgdfRPq6fqgmVh26+gFdXLP4h7ueG0tWkcW ISug== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2hNLKsm5AwYZGV8T9Aaf/kG41yJ5P8w6QlpkpQEvG/rhM50m4n WDNg+ghh3ucywk6IEUWYkxGHddbTmQUioQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM5HD3b5wSg6BgSyv+XwecWxuQPVWcYjDFsKoWbuNh7+p2/gHVbqDJJ0QVWbldHIOvu0fa115Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ef50:b0:170:9f15:b998 with SMTP id e16-20020a170902ef5000b001709f15b998mr2297081plx.102.1663292354908; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Laptop-X1 ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l6-20020a170903120600b00176677a893bsm13870963plh.82.2022.09.15.18.39.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 09:39:09 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: Jay Vosburgh , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , David Ahern , Jonathan Toppins Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests/bonding: add a test for bonding lladdr target Message-ID: References: <20220915094202.335636-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <970039e7-1c13-e6d7-cb70-53af92eb9958@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <970039e7-1c13-e6d7-cb70-53af92eb9958@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 10:09:05AM -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote: > On 9/15/22 05:42, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > This is a regression test for commit 592335a4164c ("bonding: accept > > unsolicited NA message") and commit b7f14132bf58 ("bonding: use unspecified > > address if no available link local address"). When the bond interface > > up and no available link local address, unspecified address(::) is used to > > send the NS message. The unsolicited NA message should also be accepted > > for validation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu > Acked-by: Jonathan Toppins Hi David, Jakub, Paolo, I saw the patch checking failed[1] as there is no fixes tag. I post the patch to net tree as the testing commits are in net tree. I'm not sure if this patch should go net-next? Any suggestion? [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220915094202.335636-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com/ Thanks Hangbin