From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] net: Qdisc backpressure infrastructure
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 10:00:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyigH0IvLZ8iGIvf@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829172111.4471d913@kernel.org>
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:21:11PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 09:53:17 -0700 Cong Wang wrote:
> > > Similarly to Eric's comments on v1 I'm not seeing the clear motivation
> > > here. Modern high speed UDP users will have a CC in user space, back
> > > off and set transmission time on the packets. Could you describe your
> > > _actual_ use case / application in more detail?
> >
> > Not everyone implements QUIC or CC, it is really hard to implement CC
> > from scratch. This backpressure mechnism is much simpler than CC (TCP or
> > QUIC), as clearly it does not deal with any remote congestions.
> >
> > And, although this patchset only implements UDP backpressure, it can be
> > applied to any other protocol easily, it is protocol-independent.
>
> No disagreement on any of your points. But I don't feel like
> you answered my question about the details of the use case.
Do you need a use case for UDP w/o QUIC? Seriously??? There must be
tons of it...
Take a look at UDP tunnels, for instance, wireguard which is our use
case. ByteDance has wireguard-based VPN solution for bussiness. (I hate
to brand ourselves, but you are asking for it...)
Please do research on your side, as a netdev maintainer, you are
supposed to know this much better than me.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-19 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 19:43 [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 0/4] net: Qdisc backpressure infrastructure Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 1/4] net: Introduce " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 20:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-06 23:34 ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-09 7:53 ` Dave Taht
2022-05-10 2:23 ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 2/4] net/sched: sch_tbf: Use " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:45 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 3/4] net/sched: sch_htb: " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:45 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 4/4] net/sched: sch_cbq: " Peilin Ye
2022-05-10 3:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 0/4] net: " Eric Dumazet
2022-05-10 23:03 ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-10 23:27 ` Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:10 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:11 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 1/5] net: Introduce " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 2/5] net/udp: Implement Qdisc backpressure algorithm Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 3/5] net/sched: sch_tbf: Use Qdisc backpressure infrastructure Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 4/5] net/sched: sch_htb: " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 9:12 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 5/5] net/sched: sch_cbq: " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 16:17 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] net: " Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-29 16:53 ` Cong Wang
2022-08-30 0:21 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-19 17:00 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2022-08-22 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-08-29 16:47 ` Cong Wang
2022-08-29 16:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-19 17:06 ` Cong Wang
2022-08-30 2:28 ` Yafang Shao
2022-09-19 17:04 ` Cong Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyigH0IvLZ8iGIvf@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peilin.ye@bytedance.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).