From: asmadeus@codewreck.org
To: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net,
pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
davem@davemloft.net, linux_oss@crudebyte.com, lucho@ionkov.net,
ericvh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] net/9p/trans_fd: check the return value of parse_opts
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 06:23:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YyuA13q/B236lZ6U@codewreck.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921210921.1654735-1-floridsleeves@gmail.com>
Li Zhong wrote on Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 02:09:21PM -0700:
> parse_opts() could fail when there is error parsing mount options into
> p9_fd_opts structure due to allocation failure. In that case opts will
> contain invalid data.
In practice opts->rfd/wfd is set to ~0 before the failure modes so they
will contain exactly what we want them to contain: something that'll
fail the check below.
It is however cleared like this so I'll queue this patch in 9p tree when
I have a moment, but I'll clarify the commit message to say this is
NO-OP : please feel free to send a v2 if you want to put your own words
in there; otherwise it'll be something like below:
----
net/9p: clarify trans_fd parse_opt failure handling
This parse_opts will set invalid opts.rfd/wfd in case of failure which
we already check, but it is not clear for readers that parse_opts error
are handled in p9_fd_create: clarify this by explicitely checking the
return value.
----
Also, in practice args != null doesn't seem to be checked before (the
parse_opt() in client.c allows it) so keeping the error message common
might be better?
(allocation failure will print its own messages anyway and doesn't need
checking)
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <floridsleeves@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/9p/trans_fd.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/9p/trans_fd.c b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> index e758978b44be..11ae64c1a24b 100644
> --- a/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> +++ b/net/9p/trans_fd.c
> @@ -1061,7 +1061,9 @@ p9_fd_create(struct p9_client *client, const char *addr, char *args)
> int err;
> struct p9_fd_opts opts;
>
> - parse_opts(args, &opts);
> + err = parse_opts(args, &opts);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> client->trans_opts.fd.rfd = opts.rfd;
> client->trans_opts.fd.wfd = opts.wfd;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-21 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 21:09 [PATCH net-next v1] net/9p/trans_fd: check the return value of parse_opts Li Zhong
2022-09-21 21:23 ` asmadeus [this message]
2022-09-21 22:12 ` Li Zhong
2022-09-22 9:38 ` Christian Schoenebeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YyuA13q/B236lZ6U@codewreck.org \
--to=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ericvh@gmail.com \
--cc=floridsleeves@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
--cc=lucho@ionkov.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).