From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/7] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot()
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 08:23:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzBycCwecSUlGgjX@yury-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220923155542.1212814-1-vschneid@redhat.com>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 04:55:37PM +0100, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> for_each_cpu_and() is very convenient as it saves having to allocate a
> temporary cpumask to store the result of cpumask_and(). The same issue
> applies to cpumask_andnot() which doesn't actually need temporary storage
> for iteration purposes.
>
> Following what has been done for for_each_cpu_and(), introduce
> for_each_cpu_andnot().
>
> Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/cpumask.h | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> index 1b442fb2001f..4c69e338bb8c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
> @@ -238,6 +238,25 @@ unsigned int cpumask_next_and(int n, const struct cpumask *src1p,
> nr_cpumask_bits, n + 1);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * cpumask_next_andnot - get the next cpu in *src1p & ~*src2p
> + * @n: the cpu prior to the place to search (ie. return will be > @n)
> + * @src1p: the first cpumask pointer
> + * @src2p: the second cpumask pointer
> + *
> + * Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no further cpus set in *src1p & ~*src2p
> + */
> +static inline
> +unsigned int cpumask_next_andnot(int n, const struct cpumask *src1p,
> + const struct cpumask *src2p)
> +{
> + /* -1 is a legal arg here. */
> + if (n != -1)
> + cpumask_check(n);
This is wrong. n-1 should be illegal here. The correct check is:
cpumask_check(n+1);
> + return find_next_andnot_bit(cpumask_bits(src1p), cpumask_bits(src2p),
> + nr_cpumask_bits, n + 1);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * for_each_cpu - iterate over every cpu in a mask
> * @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
> @@ -317,6 +336,26 @@ unsigned int __pure cpumask_next_wrap(int n, const struct cpumask *mask, int sta
> (cpu) = cpumask_next_and((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)), \
> (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
>
> +/**
> + * for_each_cpu_andnot - iterate over every cpu present in one mask, excluding
> + * those present in another.
> + * @cpu: the (optionally unsigned) integer iterator
> + * @mask1: the first cpumask pointer
> + * @mask2: the second cpumask pointer
> + *
> + * This saves a temporary CPU mask in many places. It is equivalent to:
> + * struct cpumask tmp;
> + * cpumask_andnot(&tmp, &mask1, &mask2);
> + * for_each_cpu(cpu, &tmp)
> + * ...
> + *
> + * After the loop, cpu is >= nr_cpu_ids.
> + */
> +#define for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, mask1, mask2) \
> + for ((cpu) = -1; \
> + (cpu) = cpumask_next_andnot((cpu), (mask1), (mask2)), \
> + (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;)
This would raise cpumaks_check() warning at the very last iteration.
Because cpu is initialized insize the loop, you don't need to check it
at all. You can do it like this:
#define for_each_cpu_andnot(cpu, mask1, mask2) \
for_each_andnot_bit(...)
Check this series for details (and please review).
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220919210559.1509179-8-yury.norov@gmail.com/T/
Thanks,
Yury
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-25 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-23 13:25 [PATCH v4 0/7] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 13:25 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] lib/find_bit: Introduce find_next_andnot_bit() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:44 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface Yury Norov
2022-09-23 15:49 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] cpumask: Introduce for_each_cpu_andnot() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-25 15:23 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2022-09-27 16:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-27 20:02 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] lib/test_cpumask: Add for_each_cpu_and(not) tests Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] sched/core: Merge cpumask_andnot()+for_each_cpu() into for_each_cpu_andnot() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-25 15:00 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-25 15:24 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-27 16:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-27 19:30 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-25 18:05 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-25 18:13 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-27 16:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_cpu() Valentin Schneider
2022-09-25 14:58 ` Yury Norov
2022-09-27 16:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2022-09-23 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints Valentin Schneider
2022-09-25 7:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] sched, net: NUMA-aware CPU spreading interface Tariq Toukan
2022-10-18 6:36 ` Tariq Toukan
2022-10-18 16:50 ` Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzBycCwecSUlGgjX@yury-laptop \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox