From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Vlad Buslov <vladbu@nvidia.com>, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@nvidia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] net: Fix return value of qdisc ingress handling on success
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2022 11:00:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzCXUN6bKSb762Pn@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1664093662-32069-2-git-send-email-paulb@nvidia.com>
On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 11:14:21AM +0300, Paul Blakey wrote:
> Currently qdisc ingress handling (sch_handle_ingress()) doesn't
> set a return value and it is left to the old return value of
> the caller (__netif_receive_skb_core()) which is RX drop, so if
> the packet is consumed, caller will stop and return this value
> as if the packet was dropped.
>
> This causes a problem in the kernel tcp stack when having a
> egress tc rule forwarding to a ingress tc rule.
> The tcp stack sending packets on the device having the egress rule
> will see the packets as not successfully transmitted (although they
> actually were), will not advance it's internal state of sent data,
> and packets returning on such tcp stream will be dropped by the tcp
> stack with reason ack-of-unsent-data. See reproduction in [0] below.
>
Hm, but how is this return value propagated to egress? I checked
tcf_mirred_act() code, but don't see how it is even used there.
318 err = tcf_mirred_forward(want_ingress, skb2);
319 if (err) {
320 out:
321 tcf_action_inc_overlimit_qstats(&m->common);
322 if (tcf_mirred_is_act_redirect(m_eaction))
323 retval = TC_ACT_SHOT;
324 }
325 __this_cpu_dec(mirred_rec_level);
326
327 return retval;
What am I missing?
Also, the offending commit is very old and this configuration is not
uncommon at all, how could we even not notice this for such a long time?
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-25 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-25 8:14 [PATCH net v2 0/2] net: Fix return value of qdisc ingress handling on success Paul Blakey
2022-09-25 8:14 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] " Paul Blakey
2022-09-25 18:00 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2022-09-28 7:55 ` Paul Blakey
2022-10-01 20:19 ` Cong Wang
2022-10-01 20:33 ` Cong Wang
2022-10-02 9:30 ` Paul Blakey
2022-09-25 8:14 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: add selftest for chaining of tc ingress handling to egress Paul Blakey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzCXUN6bKSb762Pn@pop-os.localdomain \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ozsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=paulb@nvidia.com \
--cc=roid@nvidia.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox