From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1000C54EE9 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2022 02:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231278AbiI1CkD (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 22:40:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37044 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229940AbiI1CkB (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 22:40:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 316967DF5E for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:39:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id u12so2778340pjj.1 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:39:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4I8AoLqqTBpkILztOJnlpMHMHnkgltLXuTruxEQ7Nw8=; b=iYvQ1xSFM1QvGeWEUBXymfu3T1O948tKjP1H+AQFV5wxJZUTg0GywLN/Re/Z+RZTYx pkZ5AEg+RC/xJN1mXuSiMTr4J+JyEExOYr3+IvNpXBzh5azcJcNWqqta5QiKc/WlLTgG kA5FMDwg3i8xk9M0VrAkKZZwqgOPEdKDwQN27w/pDT8rCyLpn5J/lS45BXqUqp8T9c6y OV8z3XR8IcCnXULtpzjBpveZg6afXMITJQFR1kr7C+aGziRbVM11qqx/WE/MMbMfUrcj CKvCeiO0ukfRxt/+7fMzUXQgDRgdj33NZwIa3DGC/JuBjVm/UoSqfOJaRs2B1mvAVGnz jqTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=4I8AoLqqTBpkILztOJnlpMHMHnkgltLXuTruxEQ7Nw8=; b=fQFumAZ+PDtxIMdRTK/Nu8Bxj9EppP4CJpUtTxygnNKsjzROMXE1lOiZTi4l++KlGN Edzcg5FcaQwseVs2hIXhbLiybveB1muCpD2WYl+sAOPUBB4qlIN2yVsd7Eytrx8h3p4U hu9Vi02OOJsOaH+nQcidVqa3oC02mJcNavDTW56tidwXnzDrqOA9Gi/ycDeDnLSNAoHa US8FxoVgG2aDs1jLI6NsF4OUHdHu8g4TNtHOTq/Hvtt6zS28CoKHDD/a7HMsPIw2WCfO uxeLt98d2oQb8K4U/OM2g9dOfYgbPbyTOBl87xTJXrDZQlcweA0pAaa59Ulv+lxXqmGA 1Sog== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2Wdr/ydcrs7L0Yz3MY2lLjHaY03J/d1hoHjADNBGdqSG0lRvfl opmBO9jogLLwTlr4Av/58ag= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4cEfQlzR1r/aWwnYdNLMOIhS2LwQ9xCpx41sYbq835QfrNrxM9qbGcukJGIxAlp5rFhxAX/g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:350d:b0:202:ff91:a0bd with SMTP id ls13-20020a17090b350d00b00202ff91a0bdmr7964532pjb.46.1664332795617; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Laptop-X1 ([43.228.180.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17-20020a17090341d100b00172a670607asm2286906ple.300.2022.09.27.19.39.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 19:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 10:39:49 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Ido Schimmel , Petr Machata , Florent Fourcot , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Nicolas Dichtel , Guillaume Nault , David Ahern Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 net-next] rtnetlink: Honour NLM_F_ECHO flag in rtnl_{new, set, del}link Message-ID: References: <20220927041303.152877-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20220927072130.6d5204a3@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220927072130.6d5204a3@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:21:30AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:13:03 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: > > @@ -3382,6 +3401,12 @@ static int rtnl_newlink_create(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ifinfomsg *ifm, > > if (err) > > goto out_unregister; > > } > > + > > + nskb = rtmsg_ifinfo_build_skb(RTM_NEWLINK, dev, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL, NULL, > > + 0, pid, nlh->nlmsg_seq); > > + if (nskb) > > + rtnl_notify(nskb, dev_net(dev), pid, RTNLGRP_LINK, nlh, GFP_KERNEL); > > + > > out: > > if (link_net) > > put_net(link_net); > > I'm surprised you're adding new notifications. Does the kernel not > already notify about new links? I thought rtnl_newlink_create() -> > rtnl_configure_link() -> __dev_notify_flags() sends a notification, > already. I think __dev_notify_flags() only sends notification when dev flag changed. On the other hand, the notification is sent via multicast, while this patch is intend to unicast the notification to the user space. Thanks Hangbin