From: Shane Parslow <shaneparslow808@gmail.com>
To: "Kumar, M Chetan" <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel mapping
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:06:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YzPkeEE0rbCurF4L@arch-x1c> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR11MB5008658CADCDADE43C6B0D5BD7559@SJ0PR11MB5008.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 01:43:22PM +0000, Kumar, M Chetan wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shane Parslow <shaneparslow808@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 26, 2022 9:35 AM
> > To: shaneparslow808@gmail.com
> > Cc: Kumar, M Chetan <m.chetan.kumar@intel.com>; linuxwwan
> > <linuxwwan@intel.com>; Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>; Sergey
> > Ryazanov <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>; Johannes Berg
> > <johannes@sipsolutions.net>; David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Eric
> > Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>;
> > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel
> > mapping
> >
> > This patch fixes the control channel mapping for the 7360, which was
> > previously the same as the 7560.
> >
> > As shown by the reverse engineering efforts of James Wah [1], the layout of
> > channels on the 7360 is actually somewhat different from that of the 7560.
> >
> > A new ipc_chnl_cfg is added specifically for the 7360. The new config
> > updates channel 7 to be an AT port and removes the mbim interface, as it
> > does not exist on the 7360. The config is otherwise left the same as the
> > 7560. ipc_chnl_cfg_get is updated to switch between the two configs.
> > In ipc_imem, a special case for the mbim port is removed as it no longer
> > exists in the 7360 ipc_chnl_cfg.
> >
> > As a result of this, the second userspace AT port now functions whereas
> > previously it was routed to the trace channel. Modem crashes ("confused
> > phase", "msg timeout", "PORT open refused") resulting from garbage being
> > sent to the modem are also fixed.
>
> Trace channel is mapped to 3rd entry.
>
> /* Trace */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_3, IPC_MEM_PIPE_6, IPC_MEM_PIPE_7,
> IPC_MEM_TDS_TRC, IPC_MEM_TDS_TRC, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_TRC_BUF_SIZE,
> WWAN_PORT_UNKNOWN },
>
> I cross checked by running AT test on 7360. Both ports are functional as expected.
> We should be able to send or receive AT commands with existing below config.
>
> /* IAT0 */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_2, IPC_MEM_PIPE_4, IPC_MEM_PIPE_5,
> IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_AT_BUF_SIZE,
> WWAN_PORT_AT }, -----------> wwan0at0
>
> /* IAT1 */
> { IPC_MEM_CTRL_CHL_ID_4, IPC_MEM_PIPE_8, IPC_MEM_PIPE_9,
> IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_TDS_AT, IPC_MEM_MAX_DL_AT_BUF_SIZE,
> WWAN_PORT_AT }, ------------> wwan0at1
>
> Does this second AT port (wwan0at1) goes bad at some point or is always not functional/modem
> crashes sooner we issue AT command ?
>
> Could you please help to check the modem fw details by running below command.
> at+xgendata
Upon further investigation, it looks like the modem crashes only occur
after S3 sleep, and are likely a different issue that this patch does
not fix. Sorry for the confusion.
I say that the channels are mapped incorrectly because upon opening
wwan0at0, I recieve "+XLCSINIT: UtaLcsInitializeRspCb received result = 0",
and no response to AT commands. The behavior I would expect, and the
behavior I get after applying the patch, is normal responses to AT
commands in the same way as wwan0at1 pre-patch.
To be clear, my patch points wwan0at0 to channel 4, and wwan0at1 to channel
7. I have perhaps been ambiguous with the terms I have been using.
To recap:
-- The modem crashes are likely an unrelated issue.
-- wwan0at0 is currently unresponsive to commands, and outputs
"+XLCSINIT...", but responds normally post-patch.
AT+XGENDATA returns the following:
+XGENDATA: "XG736ES21S5E20NAMAV2DEFA19223101408
M2_7360_XMM7360_REV_2.1_RPC_NAND 2019-May-29 11:40:45
*XG736ES21S5E20NAMAV2DEFA19223101408__M.2_7360_MR2_01.1920.00*"
"*"
"FAB-CODE:7*SDRAMVendor=0x08 (Winbond), SDRAMRevision=0x0000"
I don't see any firmware updates online.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-26 4:05 [PATCH net] net: wwan: iosm: Fix 7360 WWAN card control channel mapping Shane Parslow
2022-09-26 20:11 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 20:51 ` Shane Parslow
2022-09-26 21:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-26 22:21 ` Shane Parslow
2022-09-27 13:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-27 13:43 ` Kumar, M Chetan
2022-09-28 6:06 ` Shane Parslow [this message]
2022-10-21 14:04 ` Kumar, M Chetan
2022-10-21 23:54 ` Shane Parslow
2022-10-20 19:13 ` Shane Parslow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YzPkeEE0rbCurF4L@arch-x1c \
--to=shaneparslow808@gmail.com \
--cc=m.chetan.kumar@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).