From: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
To: kalavakunta.hari.prasad@gmail.com
Cc: sam@mendozajonas.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
npeacock@meta.com, akozlov@meta.com, hkalavakunta@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: ncsi: Fix GCPS 64-bit member variables
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:50:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z/eiki2mlBiAeBrc@home.paul.comp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250410012309.1343-1-kalavakunta.hari.prasad@gmail.com>
Hello Hari,
Thank you for the patch, it looks really clean. However I have one
more question now.
On Wed, Apr 09, 2025 at 06:23:08PM -0700, kalavakunta.hari.prasad@gmail.com wrote:
> @@ -290,11 +289,11 @@ struct ncsi_rsp_gcps_pkt {
> __be32 tx_1023_frames; /* Tx 512-1023 bytes frames */
> __be32 tx_1522_frames; /* Tx 1024-1522 bytes frames */
> __be32 tx_9022_frames; /* Tx 1523-9022 bytes frames */
> - __be32 rx_valid_bytes; /* Rx valid bytes */
> + __be64 rx_valid_bytes; /* Rx valid bytes */
> __be32 rx_runt_pkts; /* Rx error runt packets */
> __be32 rx_jabber_pkts; /* Rx error jabber packets */
> __be32 checksum; /* Checksum */
> -};
> +} __packed __aligned(4);
This made me check the Specification and indeed somehow it happened
that they have forgotten to ensure natural alignment for 64-bit fields
(at least they cared enough to do it for 32-bit values). [0] is the
relevant read.
> + ncs->hnc_cnt = be64_to_cpu(rsp->cnt);
This means that while it works fine on common BMCs now (since they run
in 32-bit mode) the access will be trappped as unaligned on 64-bit
Arms which one day will be common (Aspeed AST2700, Nuvoton NPCM8XX).
So I guess you should be doing `be64_to_cpup(&rsp->cnt)` there.
[0] https://www.catb.org/esr/structure-packing/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-10 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-10 1:23 [PATCH net-next v2] net: ncsi: Fix GCPS 64-bit member variables kalavakunta.hari.prasad
2025-04-10 10:50 ` Paul Fertser [this message]
2025-04-12 9:23 ` David Laight
2025-04-13 22:52 ` Paul Fertser
2025-04-14 16:51 ` Hari Kalavakunta
2025-04-15 11:41 ` Paul Fertser
2025-04-15 13:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z/eiki2mlBiAeBrc@home.paul.comp \
--to=fercerpav@gmail.com \
--cc=akozlov@meta.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkalavakunta@meta.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kalavakunta.hari.prasad@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npeacock@meta.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@mendozajonas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).