netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: "Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
	"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
	"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Romain Gantois" <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 09/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for fixed-link configuration
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:50:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-qPs7y8C09xh5_b@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d3a9c9bb76b1c6bc27d2bd01f4831b2cac83f7f.camel@gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:16:00PM -0700, Alexander H Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 18:36 +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > When phylink creates a fixed-link configuration, it finds a matching
> > linkmode to set as the advertised, lp_advertising and supported modes
> > based on the speed and duplex of the fixed link.
> > 
> > Use the newly introduced phy_caps_lookup to get these modes instead of
> > phy_lookup_settings(). This has the side effect that the matched
> > settings and configured linkmodes may now contain several linkmodes (the
> > intersection of supported linkmodes from the phylink settings and the
> > linkmodes that match speed/duplex) instead of the one from
> > phy_lookup_settings().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > index cf9f019382ad..8e2b7d647a92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > @@ -802,12 +802,26 @@ static int phylink_validate(struct phylink *pl, unsigned long *supported,
> >  	return phylink_validate_mac_and_pcs(pl, supported, state);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void phylink_fill_fixedlink_supported(unsigned long *supported)
> > +{
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_5000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +	linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Any chance we can go with a different route here than just locking
> fixed mode to being only for BaseT configurations?
> 
> I am currently working on getting the fbnic driver up and running and I
> am using fixed-link mode as a crutch until I can finish up enabling
> QSFP module support for phylink and this just knocked out the supported
> link modes as I was using 25CR, 50CR, 50CR2, and 100CR2.
> 
> Seems like this should really be something handled by some sort of
> validation function rather than just forcing all devices using fixed
> link to assume that they are BaseT. I know in our direct attached
> copper case we aren't running autoneg so that plan was to use fixed
> link until we can add more flexibility by getting QSFP support going.

Please look back at phylink's historical behaviour. Phylink used to
use phy_lookup_setting() to locate the linkmode for the speed and
duplex. That is the behaviour that we should be aiming to preserve.

We were getting:

speed	duplex	linkmode
10M	Half	10baseT_Half
10M	Full	10baseT_Full
100M	Half	100baseT_Half
100M	Full	100baseT_Full
1G	Half	1000baseT_Half
1G	Full	1000baseT_Full (this changed over time)
2.5G	Full	2500baseT_Full
5G	Full	5000baseT_Full

At this point, things get weird because of the way linkmodes were
added, as we return the _first_ match. Before commit 3c6b59d6f07c
("net: phy: Add more link modes to the settings table"):

10G	Full	10000baseKR_Full
Faster speeds not supported

After the commit:
10G	Full	10000baseCR_Full
20G	Full	20000baseKR2_Full
25G	Full	25000baseCR_Full
40G	Full	40000baseCR4_Full
50G	Full	50000baseCR2_Full
56G	Full	56000baseCR4_Full
100G	Full	100000baseCR4_Full

It's all a bit random. :(

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-31 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-07 17:35 [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy: Rework linkmodes handling in a dedicated file Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:35 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/13] net: ethtool: Export the link_mode_params definitions Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:35 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/13] net: phy: Use an internal, searchable storage for the linkmodes Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Move phy_speeds to phy_caps Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Move __set_linkmode_max_speed " Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Introduce phy_caps_valid Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Implement link_capabilities lookup by linkmode Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Allow looking-up link caps based on speed and duplex Maxime Chevallier
2025-05-29  9:36   ` Jijie Shao
2025-05-29  9:40     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-05-30  7:56     ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-06-03  8:25     ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/13] net: phy: phy_device: Use link_capabilities lookup for PHY aneg config Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for fixed-link configuration Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-28  1:16   ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-03-28  8:06     ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-28 21:03       ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-28 21:45         ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-28 23:26           ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-31  7:35             ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 14:17             ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-31 14:54               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-03-31 16:20                 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 16:38                   ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-01  7:41                     ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 22:31                   ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-04-01  8:33                     ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31  7:14         ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-04-01 15:28           ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-04-01 15:40             ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-04-01 16:14             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-02  6:47               ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 12:50     ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-03-31 22:19       ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/13] net: phy: drop phy_settings and the associated lookup helpers Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/13] net: phylink: Add a mapping between MAC_CAPS and LINK_CAPS Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/13] net: phylink: Convert capabilities to linkmodes using phy_caps Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps to get an interface's capabilities and modes Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-13  9:13 ` [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy: Rework linkmodes handling in a dedicated file Paolo Abeni
2025-03-18  8:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z-qPs7y8C09xh5_b@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).