From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Alexander H Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: "Maxime Chevallier" <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"Herve Codina" <herve.codina@bootlin.com>,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Vladimir Oltean" <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Romain Gantois" <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 09/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for fixed-link configuration
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:50:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z-qPs7y8C09xh5_b@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8d3a9c9bb76b1c6bc27d2bd01f4831b2cac83f7f.camel@gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:16:00PM -0700, Alexander H Duyck wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 18:36 +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > When phylink creates a fixed-link configuration, it finds a matching
> > linkmode to set as the advertised, lp_advertising and supported modes
> > based on the speed and duplex of the fixed link.
> >
> > Use the newly introduced phy_caps_lookup to get these modes instead of
> > phy_lookup_settings(). This has the side effect that the matched
> > settings and configured linkmodes may now contain several linkmodes (the
> > intersection of supported linkmodes from the phylink settings and the
> > linkmodes that match speed/duplex) instead of the one from
> > phy_lookup_settings().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > index cf9f019382ad..8e2b7d647a92 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> > @@ -802,12 +802,26 @@ static int phylink_validate(struct phylink *pl, unsigned long *supported,
> > return phylink_validate_mac_and_pcs(pl, supported, state);
> > }
> >
> > +static void phylink_fill_fixedlink_supported(unsigned long *supported)
> > +{
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_100baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_2500baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_5000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > + linkmode_set_bit(ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_10000baseT_Full_BIT, supported);
> > +}
> > +
>
> Any chance we can go with a different route here than just locking
> fixed mode to being only for BaseT configurations?
>
> I am currently working on getting the fbnic driver up and running and I
> am using fixed-link mode as a crutch until I can finish up enabling
> QSFP module support for phylink and this just knocked out the supported
> link modes as I was using 25CR, 50CR, 50CR2, and 100CR2.
>
> Seems like this should really be something handled by some sort of
> validation function rather than just forcing all devices using fixed
> link to assume that they are BaseT. I know in our direct attached
> copper case we aren't running autoneg so that plan was to use fixed
> link until we can add more flexibility by getting QSFP support going.
Please look back at phylink's historical behaviour. Phylink used to
use phy_lookup_setting() to locate the linkmode for the speed and
duplex. That is the behaviour that we should be aiming to preserve.
We were getting:
speed duplex linkmode
10M Half 10baseT_Half
10M Full 10baseT_Full
100M Half 100baseT_Half
100M Full 100baseT_Full
1G Half 1000baseT_Half
1G Full 1000baseT_Full (this changed over time)
2.5G Full 2500baseT_Full
5G Full 5000baseT_Full
At this point, things get weird because of the way linkmodes were
added, as we return the _first_ match. Before commit 3c6b59d6f07c
("net: phy: Add more link modes to the settings table"):
10G Full 10000baseKR_Full
Faster speeds not supported
After the commit:
10G Full 10000baseCR_Full
20G Full 20000baseKR2_Full
25G Full 25000baseCR_Full
40G Full 40000baseCR4_Full
50G Full 50000baseCR2_Full
56G Full 56000baseCR4_Full
100G Full 100000baseCR4_Full
It's all a bit random. :(
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-31 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 17:35 [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy: Rework linkmodes handling in a dedicated file Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:35 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/13] net: ethtool: Export the link_mode_params definitions Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:35 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/13] net: phy: Use an internal, searchable storage for the linkmodes Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Move phy_speeds to phy_caps Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Move __set_linkmode_max_speed " Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Introduce phy_caps_valid Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Implement link_capabilities lookup by linkmode Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/13] net: phy: phy_caps: Allow looking-up link caps based on speed and duplex Maxime Chevallier
2025-05-29 9:36 ` Jijie Shao
2025-05-29 9:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-05-30 7:56 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-06-03 8:25 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/13] net: phy: phy_device: Use link_capabilities lookup for PHY aneg config Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps_lookup for fixed-link configuration Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-28 1:16 ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-03-28 8:06 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-28 21:03 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-28 21:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-28 23:26 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-31 7:35 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 14:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-03-31 14:54 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-03-31 16:20 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 16:38 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-04-01 7:41 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 22:31 ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-04-01 8:33 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 7:14 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-04-01 15:28 ` Alexander H Duyck
2025-04-01 15:40 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-04-01 16:14 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-04-02 6:47 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-31 12:50 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-03-31 22:19 ` Alexander Duyck
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/13] net: phy: drop phy_settings and the associated lookup helpers Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 11/13] net: phylink: Add a mapping between MAC_CAPS and LINK_CAPS Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 12/13] net: phylink: Convert capabilities to linkmodes using phy_caps Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-07 17:36 ` [PATCH net-next v5 13/13] net: phylink: Use phy_caps to get an interface's capabilities and modes Maxime Chevallier
2025-03-13 9:13 ` [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] net: phy: Rework linkmodes handling in a dedicated file Paolo Abeni
2025-03-18 8:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z-qPs7y8C09xh5_b@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).