Re: [PATCH v11 6/8] MAINTAINERS: rust: Add new sections for DELAY/SLEEP and TIMEKEEPING API

[Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>]

On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 11:40:21PM +0100, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> "Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 11:07:03AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> >> Thank you all!
> >>
> >> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 14:00:52 -0700
> >> Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 09:38:46PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, Mar 21 2025 at 20:18, Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> >> >> >> Could you add me as a reviewer in these entries?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I would like to be added as well.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please add the relevant core code maintainers (Anna-Maria, Frederic,
> >> >> John Stultz and myself) as well to the reviewers list, so that this does
> >> >> not end up with changes going in opposite directions.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Make sense, I assume you want this to go via rust then (althought we
> >> > would like it to go via your tree if possible ;-))?
> >>
> >
> > Given Andreas is already preparing the pull request of the hrtimer
> > abstraction to Miguel, and delay, timekeeping and hrtimer are related,
> > these timekeeping/delay patches should go via Andreas (i.e.
> > rust/hrtimer-next into rust/rust-next) if Thomas and Miguel are OK with
> > it. Works for you, Andreas? If so...
> >
> >> Once the following review regarding fsleep() is complete, I will submit
> >> patches #2 through #6 as v12 for rust-next:
> >>
> >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20250322.102449.895174336060649075.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com/
> >>
> >> The updated MAINTAINERS file will look like the following.
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index cbf84690c495..858e0b34422f 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -10370,6 +10370,18 @@ F:	kernel/time/timer_list.c
> >>  F:	kernel/time/timer_migration.*
> >>  F:	tools/testing/selftests/timers/
> >>
> >> +DELAY AND SLEEP API [RUST]
> >> +M:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
> >> +R:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> >> +R:	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
> >
> > ... this "R:" entry would be "M:",
> >
> >> +R:	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> >> +R:	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> >> +R:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> +L:	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
> >> +L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > +T:	git https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux.git hrtimer-next
> >
> >> +S:	Maintained
> >
> > I will let Andreas decide whether this is a "Supported" entry ;-)
> >
> >> +F:	rust/kernel/time/delay.rs
> >> +
> >>  HIGH-SPEED SCC DRIVER FOR AX.25
> >>  L:	linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
> >>  S:	Orphan
> >> @@ -23944,6 +23956,17 @@ F:	kernel/time/timekeeping*
> >>  F:	kernel/time/time_test.c
> >>  F:	tools/testing/selftests/timers/
> >>
> >> +TIMEKEEPING API [RUST]
> >
> > and similar things for this entry as well.
> >
> >> +M:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
> >> +R:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> >> +R:	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>
> >> +R:	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
> >> +R:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >
> > +R:      Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> >
> > ?
> >
> >> +L:	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
> >> +L:	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> +S:	Maintained
> >> +F:	rust/kernel/time.rs
> >> +
> >
> > Tomo, let's wait for Andreas' rely and decide how to change these
> > entries. Thanks!
> 
> My recommendation would be to take all of `rust/kernel/time` under one
> entry for now. I suggest the following, folding in the hrtimer entry as
> well:
> 
> DELAY, SLEEP, TIMEKEEPING, TIMERS [RUST]
> M:	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>

Given you're the one who would handle the patches, I think this make
more sense.

> R:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> R:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>

Tomo, does this look good to you?

> R:	Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> R:	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> R:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> R:	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
> R:	John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>

We should add:

R:      Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>

If Stephen is not against it.

> L:	rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org
> S:	Supported
> W:	https://rust-for-linux.com
> B:	https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues
> T:	git https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux.git rust-timekeeping-next
> F:	rust/kernel/time.rs
> F:	rust/kernel/time/
> 
> If that is acceptable to everyone, it is very likely that I can pick 2-6
> for v6.16.
> 

You will need to fix something because patch 2-6 removes `Ktime` ;-)

> I assume patch 1 will go through the sched/core tree, and then Miguel
> can pick 7.
> 

Patch 1 & 7 probably should go together, but we can decide it later.

Regards,
Boqun

> Best regards,
> Andreas Hindborg
> 
> 
>