netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt.lkml@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] splice: do not checksum AF_UNIX sockets
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:05:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z0qPALhaNORMG8Go@xiberoa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z0ptqDcLjrjqruQA@pop-os.localdomain>

On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 05:43:04PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 03:20:14PM -0800, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> > When `skb_splice_from_iter` was introduced, it inadvertently added
> > checksumming for AF_UNIX sockets. This resulted in significant
> > slowdowns, as when using sendfile over unix sockets.
> > 
> > Using the test code [1] in my test setup (2G, single core x86_64 qemu),
> > the client receives a 1000M file in:
> > - without the patch: 1577ms (+/- 36.1ms)
> > - with the patch: 725ms (+/- 28.3ms)
> > 
> > This commit skips addresses the issue by skipping checksumming when
> > splice occurs a AF_UNIX socket.
> > 
> > [1] https://gist.github.com/deweerdt/a3ee2477d1d87524cf08618d3c179f06
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <deweerdt.lkml@gmail.com>
> > Fixes: 2e910b95329c ("net: Add a function to splice pages into an skbuff for MSG_SPLICE_PAGES")
> > ---
> >  net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index 6841e61a6bd0..49e4f9ab625f 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -7233,7 +7233,7 @@ ssize_t skb_splice_from_iter(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> >  				goto out;
> >  			}
> >  
> > -			if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE)
> > +			if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_NONE && skb->sk->sk_family != AF_UNIX)
> 
> Are you sure it is always safe to dereferene skb->sk here? I am not sure
> about the KCM socket case.
> 
> Instead of checking skb->sk->sk_family, why not just pass an additional
> boolean parameter to this function?
> 
I saw that every caller was dereferrencing an `sk`, but you are right
that that a boolean would be safer.

I'll resend an updated version.

Thanks,
Frederik

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-30  4:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-29 23:20 [PATCH net] splice: do not checksum AF_UNIX sockets Frederik Deweerdt
2024-11-30  1:43 ` Cong Wang
2024-11-30  4:05   ` Frederik Deweerdt [this message]
2024-11-30 12:08   ` David Laight
2024-12-03 16:30 ` David Howells
2024-12-03 21:48   ` Cong Wang
2024-12-03 22:35     ` Frederik Deweerdt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z0qPALhaNORMG8Go@xiberoa \
    --to=deweerdt.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).