From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, vladimir.oltean@nxp.com,
xiaoning.wang@nxp.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, frank.li@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 5/5] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 17:09:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1W2lp5jNPqJZi4C@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241204052932.112446-6-wei.fang@nxp.com>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2024 at 01:29:32PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> Set NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 bit of hw_features and features because i.MX95
> enetc and LS1028A driver implements UDP segmentation.
>
> - i.MX95 ENETC supports UDP segmentation via LSO.
> - LS1028A ENETC supports UDP segmentation since the commit 3d5b459ba0e3
> ("net: tso: add UDP segmentation support").
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
> v2: rephrase the commit message
> v3: no changes
> v4: fix typo in commit message
> v5: no changes
> v6: no changes
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c | 6 ++++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> index 82a67356abe4..76fc3c6fdec1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c
> @@ -110,11 +110,13 @@ void enetc_pf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX | NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_FILTER | NETIF_F_LOOPBACK |
> - NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> + NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
> ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> - NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> + NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
> ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
I didn't see any wording about it in the commit message / cover letter
so I will ask: Any reason not to enable UDP segmentation offload on
upper VLAN devices by setting the feature in 'ndev->vlan_features'?
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> index 63d78b2b8670..3768752b6008 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> @@ -145,11 +145,13 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> ndev->hw_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> - NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> + NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
> ndev->features = NETIF_F_HIGHDMA | NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_RXCSUM |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_TX |
> NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_CTAG_RX |
> - NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
> + NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6 |
> + NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4;
> ndev->vlan_features = NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM |
> NETIF_F_TSO | NETIF_F_TSO6;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-08 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-04 5:29 [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 Wei Fang
2024-12-04 5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 1/5] net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC Wei Fang
2024-12-06 9:23 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:33 ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 12:30 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 12:45 ` Wei Fang
2024-12-08 15:47 ` Ido Schimmel
2024-12-10 7:49 ` Wei Fang
2024-12-10 20:07 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04 5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 2/5] net: enetc: add Tx " Wei Fang
2024-12-06 9:37 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:46 ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 12:32 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 12:38 ` Wei Fang
2024-12-06 13:31 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04 5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 3/5] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number " Wei Fang
2024-12-06 10:11 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04 5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 4/5] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-12-06 9:59 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-06 10:33 ` Simon Horman
2024-12-04 5:29 ` [PATCH v6 RESEND net-next 5/5] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support Wei Fang
2024-12-08 15:09 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2024-12-08 15:54 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1W2lp5jNPqJZi4C@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).