netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>,
	willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v15 06/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_socket object
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:19:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1sNEgQLMzZua3mS@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241211-b4-ovpn-v15-6-314e2cad0618@openvpn.net>

2024-12-11, 22:15:10 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> +static struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_socket_get(struct socket *sock)
> +{
> +	struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_sock;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	ovpn_sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!ovpn_socket_hold(ovpn_sock)))

Could we hit this situation when we're removing the last peer (so
detaching its socket) just as we're adding a new one? ovpn_socket_new
finds the socket already attached and goes through the EALREADY path,
but the refcount has already dropped to 0?

Then we'd also return NULL from ovpn_socket_new [1], which I don't
think is handled well by the caller (at least the netdev_dbg call at
the end of ovpn_nl_peer_modify, maybe other spots too).

(I guess it's not an issue you would see with the existing userspace
if it's single-threaded)

[...]
> +struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_socket_new(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_peer *peer)
> +{
> +	struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_sock;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ovpn_socket_attach(sock, peer);
> +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EALREADY)
> +		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> +	/* if this socket is already owned by this interface, just increase the
> +	 * refcounter and use it as expected.
> +	 *
> +	 * Since UDP sockets can be used to talk to multiple remote endpoints,
> +	 * openvpn normally instantiates only one socket and shares it among all
> +	 * its peers. For this reason, when we find out that a socket is already
> +	 * used for some other peer in *this* instance, we can happily increase
> +	 * its refcounter and use it normally.
> +	 */
> +	if (ret == -EALREADY) {
> +		/* caller is expected to increase the sock refcounter before
> +		 * passing it to this function. For this reason we drop it if
> +		 * not needed, like when this socket is already owned.
> +		 */
> +		ovpn_sock = ovpn_socket_get(sock);
> +		sockfd_put(sock);

[1] so we would need to add

    if (!ovpn_sock)
        return -EAGAIN;

> +		return ovpn_sock;
> +	}
> +

[...]
> +int ovpn_udp_socket_attach(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_priv *ovpn)
> +{
> +	struct ovpn_socket *old_data;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	/* make sure no pre-existing encapsulation handler exists */
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	old_data = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk);
> +	if (!old_data) {
> +		/* socket is currently unused - we can take it */
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* socket is in use. We need to understand if it's owned by this ovpn
> +	 * instance or by something else.
> +	 * In the former case, we can increase the refcounter and happily
> +	 * use it, because the same UDP socket is expected to be shared among
> +	 * different peers.
> +	 *
> +	 * Unlikely TCP, a single UDP socket can be used to talk to many remote

(since I'm commenting on this patch:)

s/Unlikely/Unlike/

[I have some more nits/typos here and there but I worry the
maintainers will get "slightly" annoyed if I make you repost 22
patches once again :) -- if that's all I find in the next few days,
everyone might be happier if I stash them and we get them fixed after
merging?]

-- 
Sabrina

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-12 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11 21:15 [PATCH net-next v15 00/22] Introducing OpenVPN Data Channel Offload Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 01/22] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn) Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 02/22] ovpn: add basic netlink support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-13 16:45   ` Donald Hunter
2024-12-13 17:00     ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 03/22] ovpn: add basic interface creation/destruction/management routines Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-13 12:32   ` Donald Hunter
2024-12-13 12:37     ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 04/22] ovpn: keep carrier always on for MP interfaces Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 05/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_peer object Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 06/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_socket object Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-12 16:19   ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2024-12-12 22:46     ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 11:09       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-16 11:50         ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-17  0:40           ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 07/22] ovpn: implement basic TX path (UDP) Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 08/22] ovpn: implement basic RX " Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 09/22] ovpn: implement packet processing Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:58   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 10/22] ovpn: store tunnel and transport statistics Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:20   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 11/22] ovpn: implement TCP transport Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 13:59   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-16 14:09     ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:19       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 12/22] ovpn: implement multi-peer support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 13/22] ovpn: implement peer lookup logic Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 14/22] ovpn: implement keepalive mechanism Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 15/22] ovpn: add support for updating local UDP endpoint Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 16/22] ovpn: add support for peer floating Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 17/22] ovpn: implement peer add/get/dump/delete via netlink Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 18/22] ovpn: implement key add/get/del/swap " Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 19/22] ovpn: kill key and notify userspace in case of IV exhaustion Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 20/22] ovpn: notify userspace when a peer is deleted Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 21/22] ovpn: add basic ethtool support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 22/22] testing/selftests: add test tool and scripts for ovpn module Antonio Quartulli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z1sNEgQLMzZua3mS@hog \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
    --cc=shaw.leon@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).