From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@openvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@gmail.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v15 06/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_socket object
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 17:19:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z1sNEgQLMzZua3mS@hog> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241211-b4-ovpn-v15-6-314e2cad0618@openvpn.net>
2024-12-11, 22:15:10 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> +static struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_socket_get(struct socket *sock)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_sock;
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + ovpn_sock = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk);
> + if (WARN_ON(!ovpn_socket_hold(ovpn_sock)))
Could we hit this situation when we're removing the last peer (so
detaching its socket) just as we're adding a new one? ovpn_socket_new
finds the socket already attached and goes through the EALREADY path,
but the refcount has already dropped to 0?
Then we'd also return NULL from ovpn_socket_new [1], which I don't
think is handled well by the caller (at least the netdev_dbg call at
the end of ovpn_nl_peer_modify, maybe other spots too).
(I guess it's not an issue you would see with the existing userspace
if it's single-threaded)
[...]
> +struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_socket_new(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_peer *peer)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_socket *ovpn_sock;
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = ovpn_socket_attach(sock, peer);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EALREADY)
> + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +
> + /* if this socket is already owned by this interface, just increase the
> + * refcounter and use it as expected.
> + *
> + * Since UDP sockets can be used to talk to multiple remote endpoints,
> + * openvpn normally instantiates only one socket and shares it among all
> + * its peers. For this reason, when we find out that a socket is already
> + * used for some other peer in *this* instance, we can happily increase
> + * its refcounter and use it normally.
> + */
> + if (ret == -EALREADY) {
> + /* caller is expected to increase the sock refcounter before
> + * passing it to this function. For this reason we drop it if
> + * not needed, like when this socket is already owned.
> + */
> + ovpn_sock = ovpn_socket_get(sock);
> + sockfd_put(sock);
[1] so we would need to add
if (!ovpn_sock)
return -EAGAIN;
> + return ovpn_sock;
> + }
> +
[...]
> +int ovpn_udp_socket_attach(struct socket *sock, struct ovpn_priv *ovpn)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_socket *old_data;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + /* make sure no pre-existing encapsulation handler exists */
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + old_data = rcu_dereference_sk_user_data(sock->sk);
> + if (!old_data) {
> + /* socket is currently unused - we can take it */
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + /* socket is in use. We need to understand if it's owned by this ovpn
> + * instance or by something else.
> + * In the former case, we can increase the refcounter and happily
> + * use it, because the same UDP socket is expected to be shared among
> + * different peers.
> + *
> + * Unlikely TCP, a single UDP socket can be used to talk to many remote
(since I'm commenting on this patch:)
s/Unlikely/Unlike/
[I have some more nits/typos here and there but I worry the
maintainers will get "slightly" annoyed if I make you repost 22
patches once again :) -- if that's all I find in the next few days,
everyone might be happier if I stash them and we get them fixed after
merging?]
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-11 21:15 [PATCH net-next v15 00/22] Introducing OpenVPN Data Channel Offload Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 01/22] net: introduce OpenVPN Data Channel Offload (ovpn) Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 02/22] ovpn: add basic netlink support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-13 16:45 ` Donald Hunter
2024-12-13 17:00 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 03/22] ovpn: add basic interface creation/destruction/management routines Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-13 12:32 ` Donald Hunter
2024-12-13 12:37 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 04/22] ovpn: keep carrier always on for MP interfaces Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 05/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_peer object Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 06/22] ovpn: introduce the ovpn_socket object Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-12 16:19 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2024-12-12 22:46 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 11:09 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-16 11:50 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-17 0:40 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 07/22] ovpn: implement basic TX path (UDP) Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 08/22] ovpn: implement basic RX " Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 09/22] ovpn: implement packet processing Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:58 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 10/22] ovpn: store tunnel and transport statistics Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:20 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 11/22] ovpn: implement TCP transport Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 13:59 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-16 14:09 ` Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-16 14:19 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 12/22] ovpn: implement multi-peer support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 13/22] ovpn: implement peer lookup logic Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 14/22] ovpn: implement keepalive mechanism Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 15/22] ovpn: add support for updating local UDP endpoint Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 16/22] ovpn: add support for peer floating Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 17/22] ovpn: implement peer add/get/dump/delete via netlink Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 18/22] ovpn: implement key add/get/del/swap " Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 19/22] ovpn: kill key and notify userspace in case of IV exhaustion Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 20/22] ovpn: notify userspace when a peer is deleted Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 21/22] ovpn: add basic ethtool support Antonio Quartulli
2024-12-11 21:15 ` [PATCH net-next v15 22/22] testing/selftests: add test tool and scripts for ovpn module Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z1sNEgQLMzZua3mS@hog \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=antonio@openvpn.net \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=shaw.leon@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).