netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, nbd@nbd.name, sean.wang@mediatek.com,
	Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com, lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/5] Add ETS and TBF Qdisc offload for Airoha EN7581 SoC
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 13:09:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z2AYXRy-LjohbxfL@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241212184647.t5n7t2yynh6ro2mz@skbuf>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4369 bytes --]

> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 06:03:08PM +0100, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > Explain "the mac chip forwards (in hw) the WAN traffic to the DSA switch
> > > via the CPU port". How many packets does airoha_dev_select_queue() see?
> > > All of them, or only the first of a flow? What operations does the
> > > offload consist of?
> > 
> > I am referring to the netfilter flowtable offload where the kernel receives
> > just the 3-way handshake of a TCP connection and then the traffic is fully
> > offloaded (the hw receives a flower rule to route the traffic between
> > interfaces applying NAT mangling if requested).

Hi Vladimir,

Sorry for the late reply.

> 
> And how do the follow-up packets know to go to the same conduit queue as
> the initial packets of the flow?
> 
> As mentioned, my trouble with your current proposal is that I don't
> think it reacts adequately to the user space request. Given your command,
> packets forwarded from lan1 to lan0 should also go through lan0's ETS
> scheduler, but my understanding is that they won't, because they bypass
> the conduit. I don't encourage adding new net_device_ops infrastructure
> to implement unexpected behavior.

I guess what I did not make clear here is that we are discussing about
'routed' traffic (sorry for that). The traffic is received from the WAN
interface and routed to a DSA port (or the other way around).
In this scenario the 3-way handshake will be received by the CPU via the
WAN port (or the conduit port) while the subsequent packets will be hw
forwarded from WAN to LAN (or LAN to WAN). For EN7581 [0], the traffic
will be received by the system from GDM2 (WAN) and the PSE/PPE blocks
will forward it to the GDM1 port that is connected to the DSA cpu port.

The proposed series is about adding the control path to apply a given Qdisc
(ETS or TBF for EN7581) to the traffic that is following the described path
without creating it directly on the DSA switch port (for the reasons described
before). E.g. the user would want to apply an ETS Qdisc just for traffic
egressing via lan0.

This series is not strictly related to the airoha_eth flowtable offload
implementation but the latter is required to have a full pictures of the
possible use case (this is why I was saying it is better to post it first).

> 
> I'm trying to look at the big picture and abstract away the flowtable a
> bit. I don't think the tc rule should be on the user port. Can the
> redirection of packets destined towards a particular switch port be
> accomplished with a tc u32 filter on the conduit interface instead?
> If the tc primitives for either the filter or the action don't exist,
> maybe those could be added instead? Like DSA keys in "flower" which gain
> introspection into the encapsulated packet headers?

The issue with the current DSA infrastructure is there is no way to use
the conduit port to offload a Qdisc policy to a given lan port since we
are missing in the APIs the information about what user port we are
interested in (this is why I added the new netdev callback).
Please consider here we are discussing about Qdisc policies and not flower
rules to mangle the traffic. The hw needs to be configured in advance to apply
the requested policy (e.g TBF for traffic shaping).

> 
> > Re-thinking about it, I guess it is better to post flowtable support
> > first and then continue the discussion about QoS offloading, what do
> > you think?
> 
> I don't know about Andrew, but I'm really not familiar with the
> netfilter flowtable (and there's another series from Eric Woudstra
> waiting for me to know everything about it).
> 
> Though, I don't think this can continue for long, we need to find a
> common starting place for discussions, since the development for chips
> with flowtable offload is starting to put pressure on DSA. What to read
> as a starting point for a basic understanding?

I do not think there is much documentation about it (except the source code).
I guess you can take a look to [1],[2].

Regards,
Lorenzo

[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=23020f04932701d5c8363e60756f12b43b8ed752
[1] https://docs.kernel.org/networking/nf_flowtable.html
[2] https://thermalcircle.de/doku.php?id=blog:linux:flowtables_1_a_netfilter_nftables_fastpath

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-16 12:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-11 15:31 [RFC net-next 0/5] Add ETS and TBF Qdisc offload for Airoha EN7581 SoC Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:31 ` [RFC net-next 1/5] net: airoha: Enable Tx drop capability for each Tx DMA ring Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:31 ` [RFC net-next 2/5] net: airoha: Introduce ndo_select_queue callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:31 ` [RFC net-next 3/5] net: dsa: Introduce ndo_setup_tc_conduit callback Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:31 ` [RFC net-next 4/5] net: airoha: Add sched ETS offload support Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-12 14:37   ` Davide Caratti
2024-12-12 17:04     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:31 ` [RFC net-next 5/5] net: airoha: Add sched TBF " Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-11 15:41 ` [RFC net-next 0/5] Add ETS and TBF Qdisc offload for Airoha EN7581 SoC Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-12  9:19   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-12 15:06     ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-12 17:03       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-12 18:46         ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-16 12:09           ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2024-12-16 15:49             ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-16 18:14               ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-16 19:01               ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-16 19:23                 ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-16 21:44                   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-17  8:46                     ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-16 19:46                 ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-16 22:28                   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-16 23:13                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-17  9:11                       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-17  9:30                         ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-17 10:01                           ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-12-17 10:17                             ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-17 10:23                               ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-16 23:24                 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-12-17  9:38                   ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-17 11:54                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2024-12-17 12:22                       ` Oleksij Rempel
2024-12-17 13:28                         ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z2AYXRy-LjohbxfL@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.bianconi83@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).