netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Haren Myneni <haren@linux.ibm.com>,
	Rick Lindsley <ricklind@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org>,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] ibmvnic: simplify ibmvnic_set_queue_affinity()
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 15:04:40 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z32zCDd2GnFPW465@yury-ThinkPad> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z32t88W3biaZa7fH@yury-ThinkPad>

On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 02:43:01PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2025 at 04:37:17PM -0600, Nick Child wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 10:49:35AM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > A loop based on cpumask_next_wrap() opencodes the dedicated macro
> > > for_each_online_cpu_wrap(). Using the macro allows to avoid setting
> > > bits affinity mask more than once when stride >= num_online_cpus.
> > > 
> > > This also helps to drop cpumask handling code in the caller function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
> > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> > > index e95ae0d39948..4cfd90fb206b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
> > > @@ -234,11 +234,16 @@ static int ibmvnic_set_queue_affinity(struct ibmvnic_sub_crq_queue *queue,
> > >  		(*stragglers)--;
> > >  	}
> > >  	/* atomic write is safer than writing bit by bit directly */
> > > -	for (i = 0; i < stride; i++) {
> > > -		cpumask_set_cpu(*cpu, mask);
> > > -		*cpu = cpumask_next_wrap(*cpu, cpu_online_mask,
> > > -					 nr_cpu_ids, false);
> > > +	for_each_online_cpu_wrap(i, *cpu) {
> > > +		if (!stride--)
> > > +			break;
> > > +		cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
> > >  	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* For the next queue we start from the first unused CPU in this queue */
> > > +	if (i < nr_cpu_ids)
> > > +		*cpu = i + 1;
> > > +
> > This should read '*cpu = i'. Since the loop breaks after incrementing i.
> > Thanks!
> 
> cpumask_next_wrap() makes '+ 1' for you. The for_each_cpu_wrap() starts
> exactly where you point. So, this '+1' needs to be explicit now.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Ah, I think I see what you mean. It should be like this, right?

  for_each_online_cpu_wrap(i, *cpu) {
  	if (!stride--) {
        	*cpu = i + 1;
  		break;
        }
  	cpumask_set_cpu(i, mask);
  }

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-28 18:49 [PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage Yury Norov
2024-12-28 18:49 ` [PATCH 02/14] virtio_net: simplify virtnet_set_affinity() Yury Norov
2024-12-28 18:49 ` [PATCH 03/14] ibmvnic: simplify ibmvnic_set_queue_affinity() Yury Norov
2025-01-07 22:37   ` Nick Child
2025-01-07 22:42     ` Yury Norov
2025-01-07 23:04       ` Yury Norov [this message]
2025-01-08 14:08         ` [PATCH 03/14] ibmvnic: simplify ibmvnic_set_queue_affinity()y Nick Child
2024-12-28 18:49 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpumask: deprecate cpumask_next_wrap() Yury Norov
2025-01-03 17:39   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2024-12-28 18:49 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpumask: re-introduce cpumask_next{,_and}_wrap() Yury Norov
2025-01-03 17:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-15  3:41     ` Yury Norov
2025-01-07 13:28   ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-01-15  3:38     ` Yury Norov
2025-01-03  7:02 ` [PATCH 00/14] cpumask: cleanup cpumask_next_wrap() implementation and usage Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-03 15:21   ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z32zCDd2GnFPW465@yury-ThinkPad \
    --to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haren@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=naveen@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nnac123@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=ricklind@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).