From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F06933991; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737520802; cv=none; b=CZ9AN26bkgCIL2gfLCATKZaaVyWfS5PJqq80v7GsI3r2mXdFYmcj3FhJ4w5CPyIv+38VkerDB8lJXoi70qrYZfCRZqDrTnc1XY97KhdQB+23E73sCtlzaFCLqnauzYa5Lu6HgovGDyBHrC6Wl+ViXS7OVSF4YN2xZXXh5vm4erI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737520802; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vozpJzoYh8NFazwcE0sbja2bDFoFPU5h6TA6RG2F2eQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=N0+C1ddnSNu1KNbj25bv3kXHToP33N5ES7xARKsNJgrvRUtqecXlIG+bYbNyBaYElBO2903x2d9DjFruugAveXl3LXQfWb/NGNAV9o22t8T1uZWNTOJkp1i135zGgH9ke8kQtqdnLkwisgX6nIZpkwx1m07emDwn1LGUZfHOpmU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b=LCfNkPAL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.163.156.1 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.b="LCfNkPAL" Received: from pps.filterd (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50M18O0q013816; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:15 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=Uj1IBKSyRAR9M7uS0BMNRa1ZCi7T/v zkm1EVAV7KiDc=; b=LCfNkPAL9XOiNff3jWXdS3v6u7HvDU+yx/KMiEz10OID+h BHF+qdBG30yg0+vkh39dKE+YPVI9RDipo2vo/0K8+88vRvRQEwYNEvPBDCVlUgVF T2QsHWKovqldZ60UymJ0NVPl84Roh53Sw4PXe+Jt3e92qxJt0cPdKAXKrPqq/p2+ GY9mszuG52k4hloJInmgQ8QtZbeb7PtVXoZ2VPXDBX0KGpp3CsBBO/ebmrzOo8t+ ytK4pgvSibbA2iWu1pEBSuI6S1zmI2jIwMz/DZCQlQpMjn3TKBgDHxiUXiOVeWv7 AGn7kwtKvA1OaCqR9bC5H6Ed1EwwMn2uLik99WTA== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44apr98pb6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from m0360083.ppops.net (m0360083.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.18.0.8/8.18.0.8) with ESMTP id 50M4dEAc032338; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:14 GMT Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 44apr98pb1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.2/8.18.1.2) with ESMTP id 50M1MuQv022387; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:12 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 448r4k6mpg-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:12 +0000 Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.102]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 50M4d8EP34538106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:09 GMT Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D831E20043; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AAB20040; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from linux.ibm.com (unknown [9.43.19.247]) by smtpav03.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 22 Jan 2025 04:39:03 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:09:00 +0530 From: Saket Kumar Bhaskar To: "D. Wythe" Cc: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, yhs@fb.com, edumazet@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, guwen@linux.alibaba.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc_ops Message-ID: References: <20250116074442.79304-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <20250116074442.79304-6-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> <20250122024651.GB81479@j66a10360.sqa.eu95> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250122024651.GB81479@j66a10360.sqa.eu95> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: Q9lflqyZ0u44bxu6ZGJfEd2KlfghN-gc X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Q41V1KpJ1CnwKQ7Q8J91CM5w7UWBe_ai X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1057,Hydra:6.0.680,FMLib:17.12.68.34 definitions=2025-01-22_01,2025-01-21_03,2024-11-22_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.19.0-2411120000 definitions=main-2501220030 On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:46:51AM +0800, D. Wythe wrote: > On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:12:07PM +0530, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:44:42PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote: > > > This tests introduces a tiny smc_ops for filtering SMC connections based on > > > IP pairs, and also adds a realistic topology model to verify this ops. > > > > > > Also, we can only use SMC loopback under CI test, so an > > > additional configuration needs to be enabled. > > > > > > Follow the steps below to run this test. > > > > > > make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf > > > cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf > > > sudo ./test_progs -t smc > > > > > > Results shows: > > > Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED > > > > > > Signed-off-by: D. Wythe > > > --- > > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 4 + > > > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c | 397 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c | 117 ++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 518 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c > > > create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config > > > index c378d5d07e02..fac2f2a9d02f 100644 > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config > > > @@ -113,3 +113,7 @@ CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS=y > > > +}; > > Tested this selftest with patches applied on powerpc. > > > > #./test_progs -t bpf_smc > > > > net.smc.ops = linkcheck > > #27/1 bpf_smc/topo:OK > > #27 bpf_smc:OK > > Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED > > > > Tested-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar > > > > Thanks, > > Saket > > Hi Saket, > > Thanks for your testing. I hope you don't mind if I add your test-by in > the next version. > > Best wishes, > D. Wythe > Fine for me Wythe. Thanks, Saket > > > -- > > > 2.45.0 > > >