From: Dheeraj Reddy Jonnalagadda <dheeraj.linuxdev@gmail.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"imx@lists.linux.dev" <imx@lists.linux.dev>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fec: remove unnecessary DMA mapping of TSO header
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 16:04:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5IbIeOxrkMoASdJ@HOME-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAXPR04MB85106CE97288D52A04EB685388E02@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 02:58:32AM +0000, Wei Fang wrote:
>
> Hi Dheeraj,
>
> I must admit that I misread it too. There is another case in the TSO
> header where txq->tx_bounce may be used in some cases. I think
> the most correct fix is to make txq->tso_hdrs aligned to 32/64 bytes
> when allocating tso_hdrs, then we do not need to use txq->tx_bounce
> in fec_enet_txq_put_hdr_tso(), because (bufaddr) & fep->tx_align)
> will not be true. This way we can safely remove dma_map_single()
> from fec_enet_txq_put_hdr_tso().
Hi Fang, Simon,
Thank you for the feedback. I have a clarification question regarding
the alignment of txq->tso_hdrs.
In the current code, txq->tso_hdrs is allocated using fec_dma_alloc(),
which internally calls dma_alloc_coherent(). As I understand it,
dma_alloc_coherent() guarantees that the allocated buffer is properly aligned.
Given this, should we remove the alignment check
((unsigned long)bufaddr) & fep->tx_align and the associated dma_map_single()
logic entirely from fec_enet_txq_put_hdr_tso() as you have suggested?
-Dheeraj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 10:43 [PATCH net] net: fec: remove unnecessary DMA mapping of TSO header Dheeraj Reddy Jonnalagadda
2025-01-22 12:57 ` Simon Horman
2025-01-23 2:58 ` Wei Fang
2025-01-23 10:34 ` Dheeraj Reddy Jonnalagadda [this message]
2025-01-24 1:39 ` Wei Fang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5IbIeOxrkMoASdJ@HOME-PC \
--to=dheeraj.linuxdev@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=shenwei.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox