netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
	Travis Brown <travisb@arista.com>, Di Zhu <zhudi21@huawei.com>,
	Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com>
Subject: [Issue] Handling NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_DOWN for macvlan/ipvlan in Namespace
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 06:41:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z67lt5v6vrltiRyG@fedora> (raw)

Hi folks,

Our QE team reported an issue where, if macvlan/ipvlan is moved to a namespace,
link up/down events from the lower device are not propagated to the upper link.
e.g.

# ip link add lower type dummy
# ip link add link lower name macvlan type macvlan mode bridge
# ip link set lower up
# ip netns add ns1
# ip link set macvlan netns ns1
# ip -n ns1 link set macvlan up
# ip link set lower down
# ip -n ns1 link show macvlan
4: macvlan@if3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 1a:f2:01:99:06:bc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0

After reviewing the code, I found that netif_stacked_transfer_operstate()
only transfers the carrier state but does not handle device_close/open()
operations.

I noticed that VLAN handles this state properly—if the lower link goes down
in the default network namespace, the VLAN interface in the namespace also
goes down.

I’ve drafted a patch to make ipvlan/macvlan follow VLAN’s behavior. However,
I’m a bit concerned about whether we should allow control of a device in a
namespace from the default network. For example, if a user sets ipvlan/macvlan
down in the namespace while the admin sets the lower device up, should we
bring ipvlan/macvlan up as well? For VLAN, it follows the lower device’s state.
e.g.

# ip link add link lower name lower.2 type vlan id 2
# ip link set lower.2 netns ns1
# ip -n ns1 link show lower.2
5: lower.2@if3: <BROADCAST,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether b6:82:39:94:f1:67 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
# ip link set lower down
# ip link set lower up
# ip -n ns1 link show lower.2
5: lower.2@if3: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
    link/ether b6:82:39:94:f1:67 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0

Looking forward to your thoughts.

Best,
Hangbin

             reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14  6:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14  6:41 Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-02-24  6:14 ` [Issue] Handling NETDEV_UP/NETDEV_DOWN for macvlan/ipvlan in Namespace Hangbin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z67lt5v6vrltiRyG@fedora \
    --to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=travisb@arista.com \
    --cc=venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com \
    --cc=zhudi21@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).