From: Ted Chen <znscnchen@gmail.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde ipv6
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:13:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6ISkVTHtknDTPGn@t-dallas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z59gc6--yjT6nLCE@shredder>
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:34:22PM +0800, Ted Chen wrote:
> > Update the comment to indicate that both ipv4/udp.c and ipv6/udp.c invoke
>
> Nit: net/ipv4/udp.c and net/ipv6/udp.c
>
> > vxlan_rcv() to process packets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ted Chen <znscnchen@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > index 5ef40ac816cc..8bdf91d1fdfe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > @@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
> > return err <= 1;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
> > +/* Callback from net/ipv{4,6}/udp.c to receive packets */
>
> Maybe just remove the comment? I don't see how anyone can find it
> useful.
I'm ok with either way.
Please let me know if I need to send a separate one or the current one
is fine.
> Regardless, please submit this patch separately as it's not related to
> the other patches in the series.
I came across this comment when I wrote this series as I found vxlan_rcv()
is called for both IPV4 and IPV6. Besides, I saw vxlan_err_lookup() has a
similar comment.
> > static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
> > --
> > 2.39.2
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-01 11:32 [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] vxlan: Support of Hub Spoke Network to use the same VNI Ted Chen
2025-02-01 11:34 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 1/3] vxlan: vxlan_vs_find_vni(): Find vxlan_dev according to vni and remote_ip Ted Chen
2025-02-02 11:56 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-02-04 13:09 ` Ted Chen
2025-02-04 14:16 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-02-05 12:27 ` Ted Chen
2025-02-01 11:34 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 2/3] vxlan: Do not treat vxlan dev as used when unicast remote_ip mismatches Ted Chen
2025-02-01 11:34 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde ipv6 Ted Chen
2025-02-02 12:09 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-02-04 13:13 ` Ted Chen [this message]
2025-02-04 14:38 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-02-02 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] vxlan: Support of Hub Spoke Network to use the same VNI Ido Schimmel
2025-02-04 13:27 ` Ted Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6ISkVTHtknDTPGn@t-dallas \
--to=znscnchen@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox