From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net,
michael.chan@broadcom.com, tariqt@nvidia.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com,
shayd@nvidia.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shayagr@amazon.com,
kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 2/5] net: napi: add CPU affinity to napi_config
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:43:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6KYDs0os_DizhMa@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250204220622.156061-3-ahmed.zaki@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2025 at 03:06:19PM -0700, Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> A common task for most drivers is to remember the user-set CPU affinity
> to its IRQs. On each netdev reset, the driver should re-assign the
> user's settings to the IRQs.
>
> Add CPU affinity mask to napi_config. To delegate the CPU affinity
> management to the core, drivers must:
> 1 - set the new netdev flag "irq_affinity_auto":
> netif_enable_irq_affinity(netdev)
> 2 - create the napi with persistent config:
> netif_napi_add_config()
> 3 - bind an IRQ to the napi instance: netif_napi_set_irq()
>
> the core will then make sure to use re-assign affinity to the napi's
> IRQ.
>
> The default IRQ mask is set to one cpu starting from the closest NUMA.
Not sure, but maybe the above should be documented somewhere like
Documentation/networking/napi.rst or similar?
Maybe that's too nit-picky, though, since the per-NAPI config stuff
never made it into the docs (I'll propose a patch to fix that).
> Signed-off-by: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@intel.com>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 14 +++++++--
> net/core/dev.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 33e84477c9c2..4cde7ac31e74 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
[...]
> @@ -6968,17 +6983,28 @@ void netif_napi_set_irq_locked(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
> {
> int rc;
>
> - /* Remove existing rmap entries */
> - if (napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto &&
> + /* Remove existing resources */
> + if ((napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto || napi->dev->irq_affinity_auto) &&
> napi->irq != irq && napi->irq > 0)
> irq_set_affinity_notifier(napi->irq, NULL);
>
> napi->irq = irq;
> - if (irq > 0) {
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto) {
> rc = napi_irq_cpu_rmap_add(napi, irq);
> if (rc)
> netdev_warn(napi->dev, "Unable to update ARFS map (%d)\n",
> rc);
> + } else if (napi->config && napi->dev->irq_affinity_auto) {
> + napi->notify.notify = netif_napi_irq_notify;
> + napi->notify.release = netif_napi_affinity_release;
> +
> + rc = irq_set_affinity_notifier(irq, &napi->notify);
> + if (rc)
> + netdev_warn(napi->dev, "Unable to set IRQ notifier (%d)\n",
> + rc);
> }
Should there be a WARN_ON or WARN_ON_ONCE in here somewhere if the
driver calls netif_napi_set_irq_locked but did not link NAPI config
with a call to netif_napi_add_config?
It seems like in that case the driver is buggy and a warning might
be helpful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-04 22:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 22:06 [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] net: napi: add CPU affinity to napi->config Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-04 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] net: move ARFS rmap management to core Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-07 2:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-10 15:04 ` Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-11 0:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-04 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 2/5] net: napi: add CPU affinity to napi_config Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-04 22:43 ` Joe Damato [this message]
2025-02-05 15:20 ` Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-07 2:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-07 2:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-04 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 3/5] bnxt: use napi's irq affinity Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-04 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 4/5] ice: " Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-04 22:06 ` [PATCH net-next v7 5/5] idpf: " Ahmed Zaki
2025-02-07 0:24 ` [PATCH net-next v7 0/5] net: napi: add CPU affinity to napi->config Joe Damato
2025-02-07 18:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z6KYDs0os_DizhMa@LQ3V64L9R2 \
--to=jdamato@fastly.com \
--cc=ahmed.zaki@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=kalesh-anakkur.purayil@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=shayagr@amazon.com \
--cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox