Re: [PATCH net-next] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde ipv6

[Ted Chen <znscnchen@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:12:50PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 2/5/25 13:44, Ted Chen wrote:
> > Update the comment to indicate that both net/ipv4/udp.c and net/ipv6/udp.c
> > invoke vxlan_rcv() to process packets.
> > 
> > The comment aligns with that for vxlan_err_lookup().
> > 
> > Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Ted Chen <znscnchen@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > index 5ef40ac816cc..8bdf91d1fdfe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > @@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
> >  	return err <= 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
> > +/* Callback from net/ipv{4,6}/udp.c to receive packets */
> >  static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  {
> >  	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
> 
> Your subject has a typo
> s/inlucde/include
Oops. Sorry for that.
 
> IMO these comments are unnecessary, encap_rcv callers are trivial to find.
I'm fine with either way. No comment is better than a wrong comment.
Please let me know if I need to send a new version to correct the subject or
remove the comments for both vxlan_rcv() and vxlan_err_lookup().