netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] igb: Link queues to NAPI instances
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 10:47:09 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6pJrRRqcHYhZWss@LQ3V64L9R2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250210-igb_irq-v1-2-bde078cdb9df@linutronix.de>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:19:36AM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Link queues to NAPI instances via netdev-genl API. This is required to use
> XDP/ZC busy polling. See commit 5ef44b3cb43b ("xsk: Bring back busy polling
> support") for details.
> 
> This also allows users to query the info with netlink:
> 
> |$ ./tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml \
> |                               --dump queue-get --json='{"ifindex": 2}'
> |[{'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8201, 'type': 'rx'},
> | {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8202, 'type': 'rx'},
> | {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8203, 'type': 'rx'},
> | {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8204, 'type': 'rx'},
> | {'id': 0, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8201, 'type': 'tx'},
> | {'id': 1, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8202, 'type': 'tx'},
> | {'id': 2, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8203, 'type': 'tx'},
> | {'id': 3, 'ifindex': 2, 'napi-id': 8204, 'type': 'tx'}]
> 
> While at __igb_open() use RCT coding style.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h      |  2 ++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c  |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
> index 02f340280d20a6f7e32bbd3dfcbb9c1c7b4c6662..79eca385a751bfdafdf384928b6cc1b350b22560 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb.h
> @@ -722,6 +722,8 @@ enum igb_boards {
>  
>  extern char igb_driver_name[];
>  
> +void igb_set_queue_napi(struct igb_adapter *adapter, int q_idx,
> +			struct napi_struct *napi);
>  int igb_xmit_xdp_ring(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
>  		      struct igb_ring *ring,
>  		      struct xdp_frame *xdpf);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> index d4128d19cc08f62f95682069bb5ed9b8bbbf10cb..8e964484f4c9854e4e3e0b4f3e8785fe93bd1207 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
> @@ -2099,6 +2099,22 @@ static void igb_check_swap_media(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  	wr32(E1000_CTRL_EXT, ctrl_ext);
>  }
>  
> +void igb_set_queue_napi(struct igb_adapter *adapter, int vector,
> +			struct napi_struct *napi)
> +{
> +	struct igb_q_vector *q_vector = adapter->q_vector[vector];
> +
> +	if (q_vector->rx.ring)
> +		netif_queue_set_napi(adapter->netdev,
> +				     q_vector->rx.ring->queue_index,
> +				     NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_RX, napi);
> +
> +	if (q_vector->tx.ring)
> +		netif_queue_set_napi(adapter->netdev,
> +				     q_vector->tx.ring->queue_index,
> +				     NETDEV_QUEUE_TYPE_TX, napi);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   *  igb_up - Open the interface and prepare it to handle traffic
>   *  @adapter: board private structure
> @@ -2106,6 +2122,7 @@ static void igb_check_swap_media(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  int igb_up(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  {
>  	struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> +	struct napi_struct *napi;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	/* hardware has been reset, we need to reload some things */
> @@ -2113,8 +2130,11 @@ int igb_up(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  
>  	clear_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++)
> -		napi_enable(&(adapter->q_vector[i]->napi));
> +	for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++) {
> +		napi = &adapter->q_vector[i]->napi;
> +		napi_enable(napi);
> +		igb_set_queue_napi(adapter, i, napi);
> +	}

It looks like igb_ub is called from igb_io_resume (struct
pci_error_handlers). I don't know if RTNL is held in that path. If
its not, this could trip the ASSERT_RTNL in netif_queue_set_napi.

Can you check and see if this is an issue for that path?

igb_reinit_locked looks OK (as the name implies).

>  
>  	if (adapter->flags & IGB_FLAG_HAS_MSIX)
>  		igb_configure_msix(adapter);
> @@ -2184,6 +2204,7 @@ void igb_down(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  	for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++) {
>  		if (adapter->q_vector[i]) {
>  			napi_synchronize(&adapter->q_vector[i]->napi);
> +			igb_set_queue_napi(adapter, i, NULL);
>  			napi_disable(&adapter->q_vector[i]->napi);

Same question as above. It looks like igb_down is called from
igb_io_error_detected. I don't know if RTNL is held in that path. If
its not, it'll trip the ASSERT_RTNL in netif_queue_set_napi.

Can you check if that's an issue for this path, as well?

>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -4116,8 +4137,9 @@ static int igb_sw_init(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
>  static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming)
>  {
>  	struct igb_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -	struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>  	struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
> +	struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
> +	struct napi_struct *napi;
>  	int err;
>  	int i;
>  
> @@ -4169,8 +4191,11 @@ static int __igb_open(struct net_device *netdev, bool resuming)
>  	/* From here on the code is the same as igb_up() */
>  	clear_bit(__IGB_DOWN, &adapter->state);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++)
> -		napi_enable(&(adapter->q_vector[i]->napi));
> +	for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_q_vectors; i++) {
> +		napi = &adapter->q_vector[i]->napi;
> +		napi_enable(napi);
> +		igb_set_queue_napi(adapter, i, napi);
> +	}

The above looks fine. __igb_open is called from __igb_resume which
takes care of RTNL. So, I think this part is fine.


>  	rd32(E1000_TSICR);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> index 157d43787fa0b55a74714f69e9e7903b695fcf0a..a5ad090dfe94b6afc8194fe39d28cdd51c7067b0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_xsk.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ static void igb_txrx_ring_disable(struct igb_adapter *adapter, u16 qid)
>  	synchronize_net();
>  
>  	/* Rx/Tx share the same napi context. */
> +	igb_set_queue_napi(adapter, qid, NULL);
>  	napi_disable(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi);
>  
>  	igb_clean_tx_ring(tx_ring);
> @@ -78,6 +79,7 @@ static void igb_txrx_ring_enable(struct igb_adapter *adapter, u16 qid)
>  
>  	/* Rx/Tx share the same napi context. */
>  	napi_enable(&rx_ring->q_vector->napi);
> +	igb_set_queue_napi(adapter, qid, &rx_ring->q_vector->napi);
>  }

These seem fine to me.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 18:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10  9:19 [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10  9:19 ` [PATCH 1/3] igb: Link IRQs to NAPI instances Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:25   ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10 22:22     ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10  9:19 ` [PATCH 2/3] igb: Link queues " Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:47   ` Joe Damato [this message]
2025-02-11  7:51     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10  9:19 ` [PATCH 3/3] igb: Get rid of spurious interrupts Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 18:58   ` Joe Damato
2025-02-10 20:14   ` Gerhard Engleder
2025-02-11  7:51     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2025-02-10 19:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] igb: XDP/ZC follow up Joe Damato
2025-02-11  3:15 ` Joe Damato
2025-02-11 14:44   ` Kurt Kanzenbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6pJrRRqcHYhZWss@LQ3V64L9R2 \
    --to=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).