From: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: Clear old fragment checksum value in napi_get_frags
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:50:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z72uo1DtcEPPz03J@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250224143430.5fa61a68@kernel.org>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 02:34:30PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:14:05 +0200 Mohammad Heib wrote:
> > In certain cases, napi_get_frags() returns an skb that points to an old
> > received fragment, This skb may have its skb->ip_summed, csum, and other
> > fields set from previous fragment handling.
> >
> > Some network drivers set skb->ip_summed to either CHECKSUM_COMPLETE or
> > CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY when getting skb from napi_get_frags(), while
> > others only set skb->ip_summed when RX checksum offload is enabled on
> > the device, and do not set any value for skb->ip_summed when hardware
> > checksum offload is disabled, assuming that the skb->ip_summed
> > initiated to zero by napi_get_frags.
> >
> > This inconsistency sometimes leads to checksum validation issues in the
> > upper layers of the network stack.
> >
> > To resolve this, this patch clears the skb->ip_summed value for each skb
> > returned by napi_get_frags(), ensuring that the caller is responsible
> > for setting the correct checksum status. This eliminates potential
> > checksum validation issues caused by improper handling of
> > skb->ip_summed.
>
> Could you give an example of a driver where this may happen?
> Otherwise the commit message reads too hypothetical.
>
Hi Jakub,
Thank you so much for your review.
all the comments were addressed in v3.
Thanks,
> > Fixes: 76620aafd66f ("gro: New frags interface to avoid copying shinfo")
> > Signed-off-by: Mohammad Heib <mheib@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > net/core/gro.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/gro.c b/net/core/gro.c
> > index 78b320b63174..e98007d8f26f 100644
> > --- a/net/core/gro.c
> > +++ b/net/core/gro.c
> > @@ -675,6 +675,8 @@ struct sk_buff *napi_get_frags(struct napi_struct *napi)
> > napi->skb = skb;
> > skb_mark_napi_id(skb, napi);
> > }
> > + } else {
> > + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
> > }
> > return skb;
> > }
>
> I think this belongs in napi_reuse_skb(), doesn't it ?
>
> Please make sure you CC maintainers on v2, especially Eric.
> --
> pw-bot: cr
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-25 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 16:14 [PATCH net] net: Clear old fragment checksum value in napi_get_frags Mohammad Heib
2025-02-24 22:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-02-25 11:50 ` Mohammad Heib [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z72uo1DtcEPPz03J@fedora \
--to=mheib@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).