From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"jarod@redhat.com" <jarod@redhat.com>,
"razor@blackwall.org" <razor@blackwall.org>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"shuah@kernel.org" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"steffen.klassert@secunet.com" <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
"jv@jvosburgh.net" <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net 1/3] bonding: move mutex lock to a work queue for XFRM GC tasks
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 09:48:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z77jc8AB3D2xWczl@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d298da7bc638c323e6d492b2dec7f1b9ea1e1350.camel@nvidia.com>
Hi Cosmin,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:00:05PM +0000, Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> This got me to stare at the code again. What if we move the removal of
> the xs from bond->ipsec from bond_ipsec_del_sa to bond_ipsec_free_sa?
> bond_ipsec_free_sa, unlike bond_ipsec_del_sa, is not called with x-
> >lock held. It is called from the xfrm gc task or directly via
> xfrm_state_put_sync and therefore wouldn't suffer from the locking
> issue.
>
> The tricky part is to make sure that inactive bond->ipsec entries
> (after bond_ipsec_del_sa calls) do not cause issues if there's a
> migration (bond_ipsec_del_sa_all is called) happening before
> bond_ipsec_free_sa. Perhaps filtering by x->km.state != XFRM_STATE_DEAD
> in bond_ipsec_del_sa_all.
>
> What do you think about this idea?
Thanks a lot for the comments. I also skipped the DEAD xs in add_sa_all.
What about the patch like:
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e45bba240cbc..0e4db43a833a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -537,6 +537,12 @@ static void bond_ipsec_add_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
}
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ /* No need to handle DEAD XFRM, as it has already been
+ * deleted and will be freed later.
+ */
+ if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
+ continue;
+
/* If new state is added before ipsec_lock acquired */
if (ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev == real_dev)
continue;
@@ -592,15 +598,6 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(xs);
out:
netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
- mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
- if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
- list_del(&ipsec->list);
- kfree(ipsec);
- break;
- }
- }
- mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
@@ -617,6 +614,12 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ /* No need to handle DEAD XFRM, as it has already been
+ * deleted and will be freed later.
+ */
+ if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD)
+ continue;
+
if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
continue;
@@ -666,6 +669,16 @@ static void bond_ipsec_free_sa(struct xfrm_state *xs)
real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(xs);
out:
netdev_put(real_dev, &tracker);
+
+ mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
+ list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
+ if (ipsec->xs == xs) {
+ list_del(&ipsec->list);
+ kfree(ipsec);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
}
/**
--
2.46.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 9:40 [PATCHv2 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-02-25 9:40 ` [PATCHv2 net 1/3] bonding: move mutex lock to a work queue for XFRM GC tasks Hangbin Liu
2025-02-25 11:05 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-02-25 13:13 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-02-25 13:30 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-02-25 14:00 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-02-25 14:27 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-02-26 9:48 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-02-26 11:05 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-02-26 12:07 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-02-26 14:05 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-02-25 9:40 ` [PATCHv2 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-02-25 9:40 ` [PATCHv2 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z77jc8AB3D2xWczl@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).