From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Qiang Zhang <dtzq01@gmail.com>,
Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 1/4] flow_dissector: Fix handling of mixed port and port-range keys
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:39:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7XtIP8D7clSMnjg@shredder> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250218043210.732959-2-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:32:07PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug in TC flower filter where rules combining a
> specific destination port with a source port range weren't working
> correctly.
>
> The specific case was when users tried to configure rules like:
>
> tc filter add dev ens38 ingress protocol ip flower ip_proto udp \
> dst_port 5000 src_port 2000-3000 action drop
>
> The root cause was in the flow dissector code. While both
> FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS and FLOW_DISSECTOR_KEY_PORTS_RANGE flags
> were being set correctly in the classifier, the __skb_flow_dissect_ports()
> function was only populating one of them: whichever came first in
> the enum check. This meant that when the code needed both a specific
> port and a port range, one of them would be left as 0, causing the
> filter to not match packets as expected.
>
> Fix it by removing the either/or logic and instead checking and
> populating both key types independently when they're in use.
>
> Fixes: 8ffb055beae5 ("cls_flower: Fix the behavior using port ranges with hw-offload")
> Reported-by: Qiang Zhang <dtzq01@gmail.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAPx+-5uvFxkhkz4=j_Xuwkezjn9U6kzKTD5jz4tZ9msSJ0fOJA@mail.gmail.com/
> Cc: Yoshiki Komachi <komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
> Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-19 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-18 4:32 [Patch net 0/4] flow_dissector: Fix handling of mixed port and port-range keys Cong Wang
2025-02-18 4:32 ` [Patch net 1/4] " Cong Wang
2025-02-19 14:39 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2025-02-18 4:32 ` [Patch net 2/4] selftests/net/forwarding: Add a test case for tc-flower of mixed port and port-range Cong Wang
2025-02-19 14:40 ` Ido Schimmel
2025-02-18 4:32 ` [Patch net 3/4] flow_dissector: Fix port range key handling in BPF conversion Cong Wang
2025-02-18 4:32 ` [Patch net 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a specific dst port matching Cong Wang
2025-02-20 3:10 ` [Patch net 0/4] flow_dissector: Fix handling of mixed port and port-range keys patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7XtIP8D7clSMnjg@shredder \
--to=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=dtzq01@gmail.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=komachi.yoshiki@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).