From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qv1-f51.google.com (mail-qv1-f51.google.com [209.85.219.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D05D81EE028 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 20:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740171211; cv=none; b=F8WkjaHgUd73G0/B6A8uG+4B9C6IJPYNdmvmBDGLiRvTdCEJHzAipUP7NW0vvtm2BqhH887ZttlAWA+HHmvDXGOdjVLebsvKc+YL+3QsBCe1oFWz1jR5gTohSFM15bDoIeCtMIVONavzW4GRUWkZ9vIdEn11W8vLLt20vF0ERrU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740171211; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DKBUOxs/YvTIrkUUMo2exkSzPdju0uIiiP93MMD8XZs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=oRrxyKpvjbfwn+o22Tc1Zm/7Rq2WN3Pg4KXBhrSW/HNPMDeJ1Ygy6M4MjjIWwvB7CJjDyNKhpAFZ836sxIx7/f8i6eddp6kBU4oqUFX+JPilaPYRUsBGf+1jnca8Og6cGnMIEYI485i/MR6onAmfTaLk2qRmP52Q6iUcW7RtAYo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b=Hj2w0isa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.219.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=fastly.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com header.i=@fastly.com header.b="Hj2w0isa" Received: by mail-qv1-f51.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e67f377236so20048776d6.1 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:53:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1740171208; x=1740776008; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IoEJ05B0k2QKvLULjk6ScEGJs4y1XCNwR5ARbRdfbJg=; b=Hj2w0isauANNWUQzKwM/hfmGqtAobTcF7hCjaeKluckkIHsODzAm1skPzpdqSKvCxD QKq7uBXfUtZ44Kv64yCyPbjt25I067xsV2giBx2F7OtXrqaI9tnDOoyXjJ3LndZYbtrY wyFCCEOhSqKdfG+mYCPLQdhh/mxjEpO36K7ks= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1740171208; x=1740776008; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references :mail-followup-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IoEJ05B0k2QKvLULjk6ScEGJs4y1XCNwR5ARbRdfbJg=; b=sr/gm2c17uDykO0Qqlszt+uU2GYlFYxmnf2Vv0iyalLLaYi4fInPq3ub/nBSuwQqDj v6jclzzGjBw59aRqPNY6NcOVYPs6o/GiezVfZC3K2d1t9HnohB2kbVCeUXdJXJFYflqn dezA3tP7e762E+1OlDIjaQqllWeNjpwbYlzfoJo06ty9alBK3WnCG4RvH0qdS77Zf516 XRBTYOpAmmxjwvlz0AmZRXzaDktLyXJymcgwdajNs4M484ZYKuCSNu0bRi0k2W3kznVC 2oCO1NVUM5KThkSifO6TEkc2ii0Tkw7Fy6yyz98M3wDVrTyDFums1zqdUvqUhICFFxF0 GIZQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUBf5Wh/xj8H4kI4Ha4YVrvL05f4aLID5la6P9iqUNOKnUAwnr2WAwXNV2icAg/cu9F/Y5P8Ok=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxK56OE95r+UbqAcA0hs1+Olwv7ldtXdsvd6xxlBxeWVXIgOnhG li+amIia3kiFgCsAyp4gaaN6gP0WK47zUiBjSrwie4Ev/XcHb0ciE3wMHRgLyWs= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv4GTxefpA+RAFf1KDCfdYdD63qNl5ov+jg+9+G92dmLiRzVQvRvtcYWTxHn9/ 00g0fw0L4V3+SpLeH2ZaSptiwKdWakAmjSDAJ/e2xtRbTfvKcR4xe3XVcxzlshkom1nsMgDIjBN 3ODwC9sLf+a6uJFwhL9KnJuRToO54oXWH07YHTjIyZzhtYYpawTevhW5885SF9hopLyw8MfS67m hdiJsMSA5kFRsS68x/iLxh+Ix7mPxeHzBz2BHR5YkPZUGW3DsXyuTslKFu3xGWySkMwnyiSN4L2 iIU4FssHq6vZJqq8pZFgTLX3cZruP/Q6KxwMi53Qwi63p1E17Afcecx0lA6FPipT X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJ7FpVMjmW9zCHBqwF+fT7qqQnhfBLVFH/v2oLp+6xAwmp6qgigq6Pi/kJVk8ru1yhaHTEXw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:223:b0:6e6:61a5:aa4f with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6e6b01d78e8mr49854816d6.45.1740171208687; Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from LQ3V64L9R2 (ool-44c5a22e.dyn.optonline.net. [68.197.162.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 6a1803df08f44-6e65d7a436esm102248016d6.62.2025.02.21.12.53.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 21 Feb 2025 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 15:53:26 -0500 From: Joe Damato To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Kurt Kanzenbach , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Gerhard Engleder , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/4] igb: XDP/ZC follow up Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Joe Damato , Jakub Kicinski , Kurt Kanzenbach , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Gerhard Engleder , intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org References: <20250217-igb_irq-v2-0-4cb502049ac2@linutronix.de> <878qq22xk3.fsf@kurt.kurt.home> <20250219180651.0ea6f33d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250219180651.0ea6f33d@kernel.org> On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 06:06:51PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:39:08 +0100 Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > > > My comment from the previous series still stands, which simply that > > > I have no idea if the maintainers will accept changes using this API > > > or prefer to wait until Stanislav's work [1] is completed to remove > > > the RTNL requirement from this API altogether. > > > > I'd rather consider patch #2 a bugfix to restore the busy polling with > > XDP/ZC. After commit 5ef44b3cb43b ("xsk: Bring back busy polling > > support") it is a requirement to implement this API. > > > > The maintainers didn't speak up on v1, so i went along and sent v2. > > > > @Jakub: What's your preference? Would you accept this series or rather > > like to wait for Stanislav's work to be finished? > > No strong preference. If rtnl_lock is not causing any issues > in this driver, the we can merge as is. I haven't followed > the past discussions, tho. Don't mean to side-track this thread, but does this mean you've changed your mind on the previous virtio_net thread [1] ? Or maybe I'm just misreading your response there? And instead I could re-spin the virtio_net but dropping the first patch and dealing with RTNL in the code like this series is doing? For some reason I was under the impression that the virtio_net series and others like it (like this igb series) were being held back until locking work Stanislav is doing is done. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250127133756.413efb24@kernel.org/