From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Heiner Kallweit" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
"Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"Köry Maincent" <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Romain Gantois" <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>,
"Antoine Tenart" <atenart@kernel.org>,
"Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 17:40:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7tdlaGfVHuaWPaG@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250223172848.1098621-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
On Sun, Feb 23, 2025 at 06:28:45PM +0100, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Some PHYs such as the VSC8552 have embedded "Two-wire Interfaces" designed to
> access SFP modules downstream. These controllers are actually SMBus controllers
> that can only perform single-byte accesses for read and write.
This goes against SFF-8472, and likely breaks atomic access to 16-bit
PHY registers.
For the former, I quote from SFF-8472:
"To guarantee coherency of the diagnostic monitoring data, the host is
required to retrieve any multi-byte fields from the diagnostic
monitoring data structure (e.g. Rx Power MSB - byte 104 in A2h, Rx
Power LSB - byte 105 in A2h) by the use of a single two-byte read
sequence across the 2-wire interface."
So, if using a SMBus controller, I think we should at the very least
disable exporting the hwmon parameters as these become non-atomic
reads.
Whether PHY access works correctly or not is probably module specific.
E.g. reading the MII_BMSR register may not return latched link status
because the reads of the high and low bytes may be interpreted as two
seperate distinct accesses.
In an ideal world, I'd prefer to say no to hardware designs like this,
but unfortunately, hardware designers don't know these details of the
protocol, and all they see is "two wire, oh SMBus will do".
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-23 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-23 17:28 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: sfp: Add support for SMBus module access Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-23 17:28 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: mdio: mdio-i2c: Add support for single-byte SMBus operations Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-24 3:36 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-24 10:03 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-23 17:40 ` Russell King (Oracle) [this message]
2025-02-23 17:48 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: sfp: Add single-byte SMBus SFP access Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-25 12:38 ` Bjørn Mork
2025-02-25 13:06 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-25 13:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-25 17:15 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-25 18:07 ` Bjørn Mork
2025-02-25 18:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-23 18:37 ` Bjørn Mork
2025-02-23 20:31 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-24 3:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-24 7:13 ` Bjørn Mork
2025-02-24 8:47 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-24 9:35 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-24 13:31 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-24 13:48 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-24 14:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2025-02-24 14:32 ` Marek Behún
2025-02-24 14:38 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2025-02-24 16:24 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-25 8:08 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-24 9:38 ` Maxime Chevallier
2025-02-24 10:36 ` Marek Behún
2025-02-24 16:30 ` Sean Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7tdlaGfVHuaWPaG@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=atenart@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).