From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <jv@jvosburgh.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>, Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>, Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in spin lock and some race conditions
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 07:22:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z86TLTMKNX0NVq2N@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250308085451.GL3666230@kernel.org>
On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 08:54:51AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 03:19:01AM +0000, Hangbin Liu wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > @@ -616,9 +615,22 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> > return;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> > - list_for_each_entry(ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> > - if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev)
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(ipsec, tmp_ipsec, &bond->ipsec_list, list) {
> > + spin_lock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> > + if (!ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev) {
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> > continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ipsec->xs->km.state == XFRM_STATE_DEAD) {
> > + list_del(&ipsec->list);
> > + kfree(ipsec);
>
> Hi Hangbin,
>
> Apologies if this was covered elsewhere, but ipsec is kfree'd here...
Oh.. I need to get the xs with xs = ipsec->xs, then hold the xs lock.
Thanks
Hangbin
>
>
> > + /* Need to free device here, or the xs->xso.real_dev
> > + * may changed in bond_ipsec_add_sa_all and free
> > + * on old device will never be called.
> > + */
> > + goto next;
> > + }
> >
> > if (!real_dev->xfrmdev_ops ||
> > !real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete ||
> > @@ -626,11 +638,20 @@ static void bond_ipsec_del_sa_all(struct bonding *bond)
> > slave_warn(bond_dev, real_dev,
> > "%s: no slave xdo_dev_state_delete\n",
> > __func__);
> > - } else {
> > - real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
> > - if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> > - real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> > + continue;
> > }
> > +
> > + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete(ipsec->xs);
> > +
> > +next:
> > + /* set real_dev to NULL in case __xfrm_state_delete() is called in parallel */
> > + ipsec->xs->xso.real_dev = NULL;
>
> ... and the dereferenced here.
>
> Flagged by Smatch.
>
> > +
> > + /* Unlock before freeing device state, it could sleep. */
> > + spin_unlock_bh(&ipsec->xs->lock);
> > + if (real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> > + real_dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(ipsec->xs);
> > }
> > mutex_unlock(&bond->ipsec_lock);
> > }
>
> ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-10 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-07 3:19 [PATCHv5 net 0/3] bond: fix xfrm offload issues Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 3:19 ` [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in spin lock and some race conditions Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 7:42 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-07 8:11 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 8:33 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2025-03-07 10:31 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 17:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-03-10 7:53 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-11 21:08 ` Cosmin Ratiu
2025-03-12 1:04 ` Hangbin Liu
2025-03-08 8:54 ` Simon Horman
2025-03-10 7:22 ` Hangbin Liu [this message]
2025-03-07 3:19 ` [PATCHv5 net 2/3] bonding: fix xfrm offload feature setup on active-backup mode Hangbin Liu
2025-03-07 3:19 ` [PATCHv5 net 3/3] selftests: bonding: add ipsec offload test Hangbin Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z86TLTMKNX0NVq2N@fedora \
--to=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jarod@redhat.com \
--cc=jianbol@nvidia.com \
--cc=jv@jvosburgh.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).