From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F562356CC; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741630355; cv=none; b=U9KVoHbnaqs9EPoYgLesvIUvX0jnGku4udNBnfx1sOEk6D2JGyS3I7SpIf+AQUnuKmJDDWZ42/q/1c4ZJOn7szrwQqYe0YYwO7E1tavjktGbGELYCMQGTQUHAu1Z8Yhiec6U3HR9BawzyPIGpWnOeN9cUZOk312avIhParh1nRg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741630355; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xutUtI8ncSnysxzMFMlH3TgBkjEFcJ6ylYOCCdQt5sY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=TLQhCfjN1Nq9A/yjDCQzog4oDPGSsNapzc28nTDU5gEzp2cBdBWZX3l/Cu3Q3nYmsazCQaBcoXh1v+G9/YwQzWAUkfVryZPiAKP8G+yqDMBgHy7ePW49/PMwBzBlBmRFX03H2XzKggnKGkbwWU+uQtkf0qaJVsLw6eyjFXlYz50= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=FQkr1HSc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="FQkr1HSc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741630354; x=1773166354; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=xutUtI8ncSnysxzMFMlH3TgBkjEFcJ6ylYOCCdQt5sY=; b=FQkr1HScr8iBA6xrY2HK29ZJkkmZ6d9ztleZhLQlrUl6IBwrX5IpZcrV opCHADnP3V0nFNg5MYKGDB6oYxCLuVvoBd4gU5HsdwRGwNOqHRfKk5iwR Lu+bMDs1x957FWqZxAgxmGV/IuboTgapqxCXTjQc4tHBfy+NidiZOCpp8 uTQopKT0NOpJH03Kdul/AQobOjZdZFBDpB/mvelICgTq82oQhpJjDNlS1 FC1clurpE5Y5x3ZRNA2HHM4hHlEzHwFZhsppRogjeW0pNYjtMnRHbgP2v 2bl1m2Qwt6Gj9Bv42nFupKYaLC0NCfCNImURa4G6puwkaZmY3LS041jZ5 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: GgVKTgTVTAqPCT/Fik9T6Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: B98toNZ5TEmsUSr2aGnzyQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11369"; a="45433458" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,236,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="45433458" Received: from fmviesa010.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.150]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2025 11:12:32 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: XTWVcWlLSdaQ6N8oMqzVWQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: D3Ts7d9eSaqsvtxwU60bpg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,236,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="120552572" Received: from turnipsi.fi.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.237.72.44]) by fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2025 11:12:27 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A1BEB11F7E5; Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:12:24 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:12:24 +0000 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Matti Vaittinen Cc: Matti Vaittinen , Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Andy Shevchenko , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Claudiu Manoil , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] property: Add functions to iterate named child Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Moi, On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:55:53PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote: > Please note, the checkpatch.pl was not happy about the for_each...() > macros. I tried to make them to follow the existing convention. I am > open to suggestions how to improve. checkpatch.pl isn't always handling macros as well as it might. (It's just hard to parse C using regular expressions and in practice some simplifications end up being made.) -- Sakari Ailus