Re: [PATCH RFC net-next v5 10/10] net: gianfar: Use device_get_child_node_count_named()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 02:13:30PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On 03/03/2025 13:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:34:49PM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > What about the second loop (in gfar_of_init)?
> > I mean perhaps we want to have fwnode_for_each_named_child_node()
> > and its device variant that may be also reused in the IIO code and here.
> 
> I agree the fwnode_for_each_named_child_node() would be useful. I think I
> said that already during the previous review rounds. There is plenty of code
> which could be converted to use it.


> This, however, is far more than I am willing to do in the context of a
> simple IIO driver addition. The "BD79124 ADC suupport" is already now 10
> patches, 2 of which are directly related to it.

But you already will have at least one user (IIO code) and second as in RFC.
I do not ask you to _add_ patches.

> I propose adding the for_each_named_child_node() as a separate series with
> bunch of users appended. That's be plenty of beans to count for those who
> like following the statistics :)

It would sound like an unneeded churn as we first introduce something that we
already know needs a refactoring.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko